Why the study?
Patients with diabetes mellitus have a high prevalence of complex coronary disease including bifurcation lesions, but the optimal stenting strategy in this population remains unclear.
Does T- or V-stenting using second-generation DES improve 5-year target lesion failure in patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary bifurcation lesions?
Does T- or V-stenting using second-generation DES improve 5-year target lesion failure in patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary bifurcation lesions?
In diabetic patients with coronary bifurcation lesions, T- or V-stenting using second-generation drug-eluting stents is associated with increased long-term cardiovascular events.
T- or V-stenting may increase events in diabetic bifurcation lesions; leaves open optimal strategy for randomized trials.
Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a critical risk factor for the pathogenesis and progression of coronary artery disease, with a higher prevalence of complex coronary artery disease, including bifurcation lesions. This study aimed to elucidate the optimal stenting strategy for coronary bifurcation lesions in patients with DM. Methods: A total of 905 patients with DM and bifurcation lesions treated with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) from a multicenter retrospective patient cohort were analyzed. The primary outcome was the 5-year incidence of target lesion failure (TLF), which was defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization. Chronic kidney disease, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, and left main bifurcation were independent predictors of TLF in patients with DM. Conclusion: T- or V-stenting in patients with DM resulted in increased cardiovascular events after second-generation DES implantation. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03068494?term=03068494&draw=2&rank=1, identifier: NCT03068494.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cha et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: