Key result
Severe renal impairment linked to only ~26% NOAC use in acute VTE, independent of age.
Why the study?
Randomized clinical trials of NOACs for acute VTE underrepresent elderly and renally impaired patients, prompting an evaluation of real-world profiles and anticoagulant therapies across age and renal function subgroups.
How do age and renal function affect the choice of anticoagulant therapy in patients with acute venous thromboembolism in routine practice?
Observational (n=6,095)
Yes
How do age and renal function affect the choice of anticoagulant therapy in patients with acute venous thromboembolism in routine practice?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In routine practice, patients with acute VTE are older and have more renal impairment than those in RCTs, and worsening renal function is associated with decreased NOAC use.
In randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for acute venous thromboembolism (VTE), ~ 12-13% of patients were elderly and ~ 26% had mild-to-moderate renal impairment. Observational studies are not restricted by the selection and treatment criteria of RCTs. In this ancillary analysis of the RE-COVERY DVT/PE global observational study, we aimed to describe patient characteristics, comorbidities, and anticoagulant therapy for subgroups of age (< or ≥ 75 years) and renal impairment (creatinine clearance [CrCl; estimated with Cockcroft-Gault formula] < 30 [severe], 30 to < 50 [moderate], 50 to < 80 [mild], ≥ 80 [normal] mL/min). Of 6095 eligible patients, 25.3% were aged ≥ 75 years; 38.2% (1605/4203 with CrCl values) had mild-to-moderate renal impairment. Comorbidities were more common in older patients (73.9% aged ≥ 75 vs. 58.1% < 75 years) and in those with mild or moderate versus no renal impairment (75.9%, 80.9%, and 59.3%, respectively). At hospital discharge or 14 days after diagnosis (whichever was later), most patients (53.7% and 55.1%, respectively) in both age groups received NOACs; 20.8% and 23.4%, respectively, received vitamin K antagonists, 19.0% and 21.8% parenteral therapy, 2.3% and 3.8% other anticoagulant treatments. Use of NOACs decreased with worsening renal impairment (none 58.5%, moderate 49.6%, severe 25.7%) and, in younger versus older patients with moderate renal impairment (33.1% vs. 56.1%). In routine practice, there are more elderly and renally impaired patients with VTE than represented in RCTs. Decreasing renal function, but not older age, was associated with less NOAC use. Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02596230. Decreasing renal function, particularly in the subgroup with CrCl < 30 mL/min, but not older age, was associated with less use of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). Nevertheless, more than half of the older patients with moderate renal impairment received a NOAC as their oral anticoagulant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ageno et al. (2020) conducted an observational in acute venous thromboembolism (n=6,095). Nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) vs. Vitamin K antagonists, parenteral therapy, or other treatments was evaluated on Use of anticoagulant therapy according to age and renal function. Decreasing renal function, but not older age, was associated with less use of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with acute VTE.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: