Why the study?
Does remote patient monitoring (RPM) reduce hospital utilization and Medicare costs in Medicare beneficiaries over 65 with heart failure receiving home care?
Does remote patient monitoring (RPM) reduce hospital utilization and Medicare costs in Medicare beneficiaries over 65 with heart failure receiving home care?
Remote patient monitoring with video-based nursing visits did not significantly reduce hospital utilization or Medicare costs compared to live nursing visits alone in older heart failure patients receiving home care.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Remote monitoring adds no hospitalization or cost benefit over live nursing visits in older HF patients; challenges presumed RPM value and supports refined implementation trials.
OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of remote patient monitoring (RPM) upon the most frequent diagnosis in hospitalized patients over 65 years of age-heart failure (HF). We examined the effect of RPM on hospital utilization and Medicare costs of HF patients receiving home care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two studies were simultaneously conducted: A randomized and a matched-cohort study. In the randomized study, 168 subjects were randomly assigned (after hospitalization) to home care utilizing RPM (live nursing visits and video-based nursing visits) or to home care receiving live nursing visits only. In the matched-cohort study, 160 subjects receiving home care with RPM (live nursing visits and video-based nursing visits) were matched with home care subjects receiving live nursing visits only. RESULTS: Regardless of whether outcomes were being analyzed for all subjects (intention to treat) or for hospitalized subjects only, hospitalization rates, time to first admission, length of stay, and costs to Medicare did not differ significantly between groups in either study at 30 or 90 days after enrollment. A notable trend, however, emerged across studies: Although time to hospitalization was shorter in the RPM groups than the control groups, RPM groups had lower hospitalization costs. CONCLUSIONS: RPM, when utilized in conjunction with a robust management protocol, was not found to significantly differ from live nursing visits in the management of HF in home care. Shorter hospitalization times and lower associated costs may be due to earlier identification of exacerbation. These trends indicate the need for further study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pekmezaris et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: