Key result
Supervised exercise training improves patient-reported physical functioning and MLWHFQ scores versus usual care in HFpEF.
Why the study?
Patients with HFpEF experience significant impairments in patient-reported outcomes including physical functioning and quality of life, prompting an evaluation of the efficacy of supervised exercise training.
Does supervised exercise training improve patient-reported physical functioning and quality of life in patients with HFpEF?
Meta-Analysis
Single-blind
Does supervised exercise training improve patient-reported physical functioning and quality of life in patients with HFpEF?
p-value: p=<.0001
Supervised exercise training significantly improves patient-reported physical functioning and quality of life in patients with HFpEF.
Supports supervised exercise in HFpEF care to improve physical function; extends RCT evidence via meta-analysis of six trials.
PURPOSE: Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have significant impairments in patient-reported outcomes (PRO) including physical functioning and quality of life (QOL). We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of supervised exercise training (SET) to examine the efficacy of such training. METHODS: We included six single-blinded SET trials in patients with HFpEF, defined as a left ventricular EF ≥50%, published since 2010 in which participants were randomized to a facility-based exercise training program or usual care. We identified trials from a 2024 Cochrane review of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for adults with heart failure as well as other reviews and meta-analyses in PubMed. We used random effects meta-analysis to estimate the respective SET effects for five endpoints: the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) Physical Functioning Scale (PFS), the SF-36 Physical Component Summary, the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHFQ) total score, the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary Score, and the KCCQ QOL subscale. RESULTS: The treatment effect estimate favored SET for all five endpoints. However, the SET effect was only statistically significant for the SF-36 PFS ( P < .0001) and the MLWHFQ total score ( P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrated clear evidence that patient-reported physical functioning, an outcome that patients with HFpEF identify as a prominent disability, is significantly improved with SET. It also showed consistent improvements across several other multi-dimensional measures of QOL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leifer et al. (2025) conducted a meta-analysis in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Supervised exercise training (SET) vs. Usual care was evaluated on SF-36 Physical Functioning Scale (PFS) and MLWHFQ total score (p=<.0001). Supervised exercise training significantly improved patient-reported physical functioning on the SF-36 PFS (P<.0001) and MLWHFQ total score (P=.01) compared to usual care in HFpEF patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: