Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
May 16, 2026Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Heart failure etiology and response tomilrinone in decompensated heart failure

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

IV milrinone tends to prolong hospitalization in ischemic HF but shorten it in nonischemic HF.

  • n=949

Why the study?

Heart failure etiology has prognostic and therapeutic implications, but its relationship to response to inotropic therapy is unknown.

Does intravenous milrinone improve outcomes in patients with decompensated heart failure based on ischemic versus nonischemic etiology?

Population

949 patients with systolic dysfunction and decompensated HF

Comparison

48 to 72 h of intravenous milrinone vs placebo, stratified by etiology

Design

Post-hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial

Follow-up

60 days

Authors

G. Michael FelkerG. Michael FelkerUniversity of VermontRaymond L. BenzaRaymond L. BenzaVascular / Pulmonary VascularACA. Bleakley ChandlerJikei University School of Medicine

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Etiology may modify milrinone response in decompensated HF; challenges uniform inotrope use and leaves open etiology-specific trials.

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate how the cause of heart failure affects the treatment response to milrinone in patients with decompensated heart failure.
  • Study involved 949 patients with systolic dysfunction and decompensated heart failure.
  • Patients were randomized to receive milrinone or placebo for 48 to 72 hours.
  • Primary endpoint measured was days hospitalized from cardiovascular causes within 60 days.
  • Ischemic patients had 13.0 days in hospital compared to 11.7 days for nonischemic patients (p = 0.2).
  • Sixty-day mortality was higher in ischemic patients at 11.6% compared to 7.5% for nonischemic (p = 0.03).
  • Milrinone had worse outcomes for ischemic patients (13.6 days) compared to placebo (12.4 days, p = 0.055), while nonischemic patients saw improved outcomes (10.9 vs. 12.6 days).

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=949)

Structured PICO

Does intravenous milrinone improve outcomes in patients with decompensated heart failure based on ischemic versus nonischemic etiology?

P
Population
949 patients with systolic dysfunction and decompensated heart failure
I
Intervention
Intravenous milrinone for 48 to 72 hours
C
Comparator
Placebo
O
Outcome
Days hospitalized from cardiovascular causes within 60 dayshard clinical

In decompensated heart failure, intravenous milrinone may be harmful in patients with ischemic etiology but potentially beneficial in those with nonischemic etiology.

Limitations

  • Post-hoc analysis
  • post-hoc analysis

Cite This Study

Felker et al. (2003) conducted an RCT in Decompensated heart failure (n=949). Milrinone vs. Placebo was evaluated on Days hospitalized from cardiovascular causes within 60 days. Intravenous milrinone showed a bidirectional effect, tending to increase cardiovascular hospital days in ischemic HF (13.6 vs 12.4) but decrease them in nonischemic HF (10.9 vs 12.6).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a07e229e32a1219f49e72fehttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02968-6

Topics

Heart failureHFrEF treatment
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effects of Enalapril on Mortality in Severe Congestive Heart Failure1987 · 5,137 citations
  2. 2Pathophysiology of chest pain in patients with cardiomyopathies and normal coronary arteries.1982 · 242 citations
  3. 3Adrenergic regulation of myocardial apoptosis2000 · 148 citations
  4. 4Effect of Oral Milrinone on Mortality in Severe Chronic Heart Failure1991 · 2,240 citations
  5. 5Amiodarone in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure and Asymptomatic Ventricular Arrhythmia1995 · 1,235 citations