Key result
Home-based neuromuscular electrical stimulation plus cardiac rehab increases SPPB scores by ~3 points in frail CHF.
Why the study?
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation provides an alternative for patients unable to perform sufficient voluntary exercise, but its safety and efficacy as an adjunct to cardiac rehabilitation in frail older patients with chronic heart failure needed evaluation.
Does home-based neuromuscular electrical stimulation added to cardiac rehabilitation improve physical function in frail older adult patients with chronic heart failure?
RCT (n=8)
Open-label
Randomized crossover
No
Does home-based neuromuscular electrical stimulation added to cardiac rehabilitation improve physical function in frail older adult patients with chronic heart failure?
Effect estimate: Difference 2.67 (95% CI 0.3-5.0)
Absolute Event Rate: 2% vs -0.67%
p-value: p=0.046
Home-based neuromuscular electrical stimulation safely improves physical function when added to cardiac rehabilitation in frail older adults with chronic heart failure.
May enhance physical function in frail older adults with heart failure when added to cardiac rehabilitation; extends small RCT evidence but requires larger confirmatory trials.
Background: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is an alternative therapy for patients unable to perform sufficient voluntary exercises. This randomised crossover study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of home-based NMES as an adjunct to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) for improving physical function in frail older adult patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). Methods and Results: 8 frail older adult patients with CHF underwent 8 weeks of CR supplemented with home-based NMES and 8 weeks of CR alone in random order, separated with a 4-week washout period. NMES at 50-Hz frequency was administered for 50 min/day, 5 times per week, with electrodes placed on the legs. Changes in the short physical performance battery (SPPB) score, leg strength, and the Barthel index were assessed between patients with CR with and without home-based NMES. No NMES-related adverse events were observed. CR with home-based NMES had a higher total SPPB score and 5-repetition sit-to-stand test time of 2.67 points and -10.67 s, respectively, than CR alone (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.3-5.0, P<0.05 and 95% CI -19.5 to -1.3, P<0.05, respectively). No significant leg strength or Barthel index changes were observed between CR with and without home-based NMES. Conclusions: Home-based NMES safely improved physical function in frail older adult patients with CHF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ono et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Chronic Heart Failure (n=8). Home-based Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) + Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) vs. Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) alone was evaluated on Change in total short physical performance battery (SPPB) score (Difference 2.67, 95% CI 0.3-5.0, p=0.046). Home-based neuromuscular electrical stimulation added to cardiac rehabilitation increased SPPB scores by 2.67 points compared to rehabilitation alone in frail older adults with chronic heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: