Key result
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation improves exercise tolerance and quality of life as a training alternative in CHF.
Why the study?
Does neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the lower limb muscles improve exercise tolerance and quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure?
Does neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the lower limb muscles improve exercise tolerance and quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure?
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the lower limbs is a promising, comfortable alternative to traditional physical training for cardiac rehabilitation in patients with chronic heart failure.
May support NMES for CHF patients unable to exercise; leaves open need for RCTs before practice change.
Research conducted in recent years suggests that neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the lower limb muscles (NMES) may be an alternative to physical training in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). Through stimulating the work of the muscles, NMES raises the exercise tolerance, muscle mass and endurance in patients with CHF. A beneficial effect of NMES on muscle blood flow, aerobic enzymes activity, vascular endothelial function, decrease in pro-inflammatory cytokines and improvement of quality of life has been indicated. It must be emphasized that NMES procedures are comfortable for patients with CHF due to lower exercise load and therefore less intense symptoms of dyspnea. Moreover, these procedures may be conducted at home (after prior training). The possible side effects include temporary muscle soreness and skin impairment resulting from improper placement of electrodes (patients in ambulatory conditions).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kucio et al. (2014) conducted a review in Chronic Heart Failure. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) vs. Physical training was evaluated. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the lower limbs improves exercise tolerance, muscle mass, and quality of life as an alternative to physical training in chronic heart failure patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: