Key result
Low-frequency electrical myostimulation increases maximal strength ~11% through muscular adaptations in a CHF patient.
Case Report (n=1)
No
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Case report shows that electrical myostimulation improves muscle strength via peripheral muscular adaptations in chronic heart failure, suggesting utility for treating severe deconditioning.
Deley G, Kervio G, Verges B, Hannequin A, Petitdant M-F, Grassi B, Casillas J-M: Neuromuscular adaptations to low-frequency stimulation training in a patient with chronic heart failure. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2008;87:502–509. Electrical myostimulation (EMS) has recently been proposed as an interesting rehabilitation tool in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). Although its beneficial effects on exercise capacity and muscle strength have been demonstrated, the neuromuscular adaptations responsible for improved performance are not well understood. This preliminary case report was therefore planned to investigate the neural and muscular adaptations to a 5-wk EMS program in one patient. An increase in maximal strength (10.5%) was accompanied by increased twitch torque (13.9%) and slowing of muscle contractile properties (half-relaxation time, time to peak torque, and maximal rate of relaxation increased by 7.1, 31.1, and 16.6%, respectively) without changes in muscle activation. This preliminary case report therefore shows that in a highly deconditioned patient, EMS training improved strength through muscular adaptations rather than by neural changes, suggesting that EMS may be valuable for counterbalancing loss of muscle strength and function common in CHF patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deley et al. (2008) conducted a case report in Chronic heart failure (n=1). Low-frequency electrical myostimulation (EMS) training was evaluated on Maximal strength. Five weeks of low-frequency electrical myostimulation increased maximal strength by 10.5% and twitch torque by 13.9% through muscular rather than neural adaptations in a CHF patient.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: