Key result
Review highlights sex differences in PCI outcomes focusing on bleeding risk and vascular access complications.
Why the study?
Does gender affect outcomes and management strategies in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Does gender affect outcomes and management strategies in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
This review discusses the impact of gender on PCI outcomes and outlines contemporary management strategies for female patients.
Warrants sex-specific bleeding risk assessment in PCI; leaves open need for dedicated prospective trials.
Women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have poorer unadjusted outcomes as they are older and have greater comorbidity compared with men, but uncertainty remains whether gender affects outcome after these differences in clinical characteristics are taken into account. In this paper, we review recent published evidence comparing outcomes between men and women undergoing PCI. We focus on both acute coronary syndrome and nonacute coronary syndrome presentation, and the risk of bleeding and vascular access complication. We also review how gender is taken into account in recent guidelines and offer a common clinical scenario to illustrate the contemporary management strategies an interventional cardiologist should consider when performing PCI on a female patient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scott et al. (2014) conducted a review in Percutaneous coronary intervention. Percutaneous coronary intervention vs. Men undergoing PCI was evaluated. This review summarizes recent evidence comparing outcomes between men and women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, focusing on bleeding risk and vascular access complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: