Key result
Collaborative care improves self-care, QoL, LVEF, and exercise capacity vs usual care in CHF.
Why the study?
Does a collaborative care model improve self-care ability, quality of life, and cardiac function in patients with chronic heart failure?
RCT (n=114)
1:1
Does a collaborative care model improve self-care ability, quality of life, and cardiac function in patients with chronic heart failure?
p-value: p=<0.05
A collaborative care model over 3 months significantly improves self-care ability, quality of life, and cardiac function in patients with chronic heart failure compared to usual care.
Supports integrating collaborative care into CHF management; extends RCT evidence for multidisciplinary models.
Chronic heart failure (CHF) is a common chronic disease that requires much care. This study aimed to explore the effects of collaborative care model (CCM) on patients with CHF. A total of 114 CHF patients were enrolled in this study, and were randomly and equally divided into two groups: control and experimental. Patients in the two groups received either usual care or CCM for 3 continuous months. The impacts of CCM on the self-care ability and quality of life were assessed using self-care of heart failure index and short form health survey 12, respectively. Further, cardiac function was assessed by measuring left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and the level of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and by the 6-min walking test. Clinical and demographic characteristics of patients in the control and CCM groups were statistically equivalent. Compared with usual care, CCM significantly enhanced self-care abilities of patients with CHF, including self-care maintenance, self-care management and self-care confidence (all P<0.05). The physical and mental quality of life was also significantly improved by CCM (P<0.01 or P<0.05). Compared with usual care, CCM significantly increased the LVEF (P<0.01), decreased the NT-proBNP level (P<0.01), and enhanced exercise capacity (P<0.001). In conclusion, CCM improved the self-care, quality of life and cardiac function of patients with CHF compared with usual care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hua et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in Chronic heart failure (n=114). Collaborative care model (CCM) vs. Usual care was evaluated on Self-care ability, quality of life, and cardiac function (p=<0.05). A collaborative care model significantly enhanced self-care abilities (P<0.05), quality of life (P<0.05), LVEF (P<0.01), and exercise capacity (P<0.001) compared with usual care in CHF patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: