Key result
CCM linked to ~54m greater 6-minute walk distance and improved peak VO2 in LVEF 40-45%.
Why the study?
Patients with heart failure and mid-range LVEF (40% to <50%) lack approved therapies that improve prognosis, and the effects of cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) therapy had not been assessed in this population.
Does cardiac contractility modulation therapy improve functional status, exercise tolerance, and quality of life in patients with heart failure and LVEF 40-45%?
Cohort (n=53)
Does cardiac contractility modulation therapy improve functional status, exercise tolerance, and quality of life in patients with heart failure and LVEF 40-45%?
Absolute Event Rate: 80.6% vs 57.1%
p-value: p=0.15
Cardiac contractility modulation therapy demonstrates preliminary favorable effects on exercise tolerance and quality of life in heart failure patients with mildly reduced ejection fraction (40-45%).
May enhance exercise tolerance in HF with LVEF 40-45%; leaves open need for randomized confirmation before adoption.
Aims Increasing attention is being given to patients with heart failure and ‘mid-range’ left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, ≥40% and <50%) for whom there are no approved therapies that improve prognosis. We aim to assess for the first time the effects of cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) therapy in this patient population. Methods and results We assessed the effects of 6- month CCM therapy on functional status, exercise tolerance and quality of life in a subgroup of 53 patients with a LVEF of 40–45% recruited in previous CCM studies, including 37 patients in the CCM group and 16 in the control group. New York Heart Association classification improved by ≥1 class from baseline to 24 weeks in 80.6% (95% confidence interval [62.5%, 92.5%]) of patients in the CCM group compared with 57.1% in the control group (95% confidence interval [28.9%, 82.3%], P = 0.15). Six-minute walk distance increased significantly in the CCM group with a net between-group treatment effect of 53.9 ± 74.2 m (P = 0.05). Peak VO2 improved in the CCM group with a net between-group treatment effect of 2.0 ± 2.8 mL/kg/min (P = 0.02). Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire score decreased from baseline to 24 weeks with a net between-group treatment effect of −13.1 ± 21.0 (P = 0.10). There were no significant differences in the adverse event rate between the CCM and control groups. Conclusions These preliminary results suggest that CCM exerts favourable effects on exercise tolerance and quality of life in patients with LVEF in the range of 40–45% with an acceptable safety profile. Further randomized controlled studies are planned to prove these effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tschöpe et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with mildly reduced systolic function (n=53). Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) vs. Control group was evaluated on New York Heart Association classification improved by ≥1 class from baseline to 24 weeks (p=0.15). Cardiac contractility modulation therapy in heart failure patients with LVEF 40-45% improved 6-minute walk distance (net effect 53.9 m, P=0.05) and peak VO2 (net effect 2.0 mL/kg/min, P=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: