Key result
Cardiac contractility modulation decreased hospitalizations from 1.2 to 0.35 per patient-year (P<0.0001) and yielded 3-year survival comparable to or better than SHFM predictions.
Why the study?
Although CCM improved symptoms, exercise tolerance, and 6-month HF hospitalizations in prior trials, its longer-term impact on hospitalizations and mortality in real-world clinical experience remained to be assessed.
Does cardiac contractility modulation reduce hospitalizations and improve survival in patients with heart failure and LVEF 25-45%?
Population
140 patients with 25% <= LVEF <= 45% receiving CCM therapy
Comparison
CCM therapy compared with pre-treatment hospitalizations and SHFM-predicted mortality
Design
Prospective registry study
Follow-up
Through 3 years
Authors
Loading...
May reduce hospitalizations in HF with LVEF 25-45%; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
Cohort (n=140)
Does cardiac contractility modulation reduce hospitalizations and improve survival in patients with heart failure and LVEF 25-45%?
Effect estimate: 75% decrease
Absolute Event Rate: 0.35% vs 1.2%
p-value: p=<0.0001
In a real-world registry, cardiac contractility modulation significantly reduced hospitalizations and improved symptoms in patients with heart failure and LVEF 25-45%, with survival comparable to or better than predicted models.
Anker et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (n=140). Cardiac contractility modulation vs. Prior year (for hospitalizations) and Seattle Heart Failure Model predictions (for mortality) was evaluated on Hospitalizations (75% decrease, p=<0.0001). Cardiac contractility modulation decreased hospitalizations from 1.2 to 0.35 per patient-year (P<0.0001) and yielded 3-year survival comparable to or better than SHFM predictions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: