Key result
Cardiac contractility modulation significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction from 32.2% to 37.6% (p=0.026) over 25 months in patients with chronic heart failure.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the overall effectiveness of cardiac contractility modulation therapy in patients with chronic heart failure of various etiology.
Does cardiac contractility modulation improve echocardiographic parameters, functional capacity, and quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure (NYHA class II-III, ejection fraction 20-40%, narrow QRS <130 ms)?
Observational (n=61)
Does cardiac contractility modulation improve echocardiographic parameters, functional capacity, and quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure (NYHA class II-III, ejection fraction 20-40%, narrow QRS <130 ms)?
Absolute Event Rate: 37.6% vs 32.2%
p-value: p=0.026
Cardiac contractility modulation significantly improves left ventricular ejection fraction, functional capacity, and quality of life over 25 months in patients with heart failure and narrow QRS, with particularly strong symptomatic benefits in non-ischemic etiology.
Aim. Evaluate the overall effectiveness of cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) therapy in patients with chronic heart failure of various etiology. Methods. The study included 61 patients with chronic heart failure (NYHA class II-III), ejection fraction 20-40% and narrow QRS <130 ms, who were implanted the CCM devices. Depending on the etiology of heart failure, ischemic cardiomyopathy prevailed (41 patients). All patients were performed echocardiography, 6-min walk test and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire (MHFLQ). Results. The observation period was 25 months. All 54 patients significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction from 32.2% to 37.6% (р=0.026) and volume parameters (left ventricle end systolic volume from 150 to 137 ml (р=0.034), left ventricle end diastolic volume from 220 to 201 ml (р=0.044), reduced the heart failure NYHA class >1 in 29 (53.7%) patients (р=0.015), increased 6-min walk test from 265 to 343 m (р=0.029), and the MHFLQ improved from 46.1 to 35.8 (р=0.042). Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy was associated with significant improvement in MHFLQ (from 42.7 to 30.3, р=0.029) and lowering the heart failure NYHA class>1 (83.3%, vs 47.2%, p=0.012) compared to ischemic group. Conclusion. CCM is safe and effective in patients with chronic heart failure NYHA class II-III, ejection fraction 20- 40% and narrow QRS˂130 ms, who were implanted the CCM devices. Depending on the etiology of heart failure, ischemic cardiomyopathy prevailed (41 patients). All patients were performed echocardiography, 6-min walk test and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire (MHFLQ). Results. The observation period was 25 months. All 54 patients significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction from 32.2% to 37.6% (р=0.026) and volume parameters (left ventricle end systolic volume from 150 to 137 ml (р=0.034), left ventricle end diastolic volume from 220 to 201 ml (р=0.044), reduced the heart failure NYHA class >1 in 29 (53.7%) patients (р=0.015), increased 6-min walk test from 265 to 343 m (р=0.029), and the MHFLQ improved from 46.1 to 35.8 (р=0.042). Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy was associated with significant improvement in MHFLQ (from 42.7 to 30.3, р=0.029) and lowering the heart failure NYHA class>1 (83.3%, vs 47.2%, p=0.012) compared to ischemic group. Conclusion. CCM is safe and effective in patients with chronic heart failure NYHA class II-III, ejection fraction 20- 40% and narrow QRS˂130 ms. Non-ischemic etiology of cardiomyopathy was associated with significant improvement in MHFLQ and lowering the heart failure class.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amiraslanov et al. (2022) conducted an observational in chronic heart failure (n=61). Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) was evaluated on left ventricular ejection fraction (p=0.026). Cardiac contractility modulation significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction from 32.2% to 37.6% (p=0.026) over 25 months in patients with chronic heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: