Key result
Female gender links to slightly higher ACEi use but no difference in other AMI therapies.
Why the study?
Does the primary medical treatment of acute myocardial infarction differ between men and women?
Observational
No
Does the primary medical treatment of acute myocardial infarction differ between men and women?
This study found no significant gender bias in the primary medical management of acute myocardial infarction in a tertiary care setting, contrasting with some previous literature.
Supports equitable AMI pharmacotherapy by gender in tertiary care; leaves open generalizability and requires prospective confirmation.
Abstract Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of death in women, with higher mortality and morbidity compared to men. We sought to evaluate whether an inequality in the primary medical treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) exists in a sample population in a tertiary care hospital setting. There were no statistically significant differences in use of beta receptor blockers, aspirin, cholesterol lowering agent or cclopidogrel in both genders. However, women were slightly more likely to receive angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor. There is an extensive literature suggesting gender bias in the management of patients with AMI, with women being treated less intensively than men. Our research highlights the fact that there were no statistically significant differences in the AMI medical management. Clinical management of men and women with AMI is similar and should follow the standard of care recommended by the related guidelines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daraghmeh et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI). Female gender vs. Male gender was evaluated on Inequality in the primary medical treatment of acute myocardial infarction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: