Key result
Self-managed anticoagulation reduces complications versus conventional care in heart valve replacement patients.
Why the study?
Self-management can play an essential role in patients with heart valve replacement, but the specific aspects of self-management and their clinical outcomes required systematic identification.
Does self-management improve clinical outcomes in patients with heart valve replacement?
Systematic Review
Does self-management improve clinical outcomes in patients with heart valve replacement?
Self-management protocols for anticoagulation and valve monitoring in patients with heart valve replacement can reduce complications and improve care standards.
Self-management of anticoagulation merits consideration in heart valve replacement; confirms benefits over conventional care in Level 1 evidence.
INTRODUCTION: For patients with heart valve replacement, self-management can play an essential role in the management of their condition. AIM: This review aimed to identify the aspects of self-management and its clinical outcomes in patients with heart valve replacement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this systematic review, the peer-reviewed research literature on self-management of patients with heart valve replacement was assessed. Since May 2020, the PubMed, Scopus, and web of science databases were searched regardless of time and language limitations. The eligibility of the articles was assessed by title or abstract according to the search strategy. Article selection was applied regarding to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Also, article screening was conducted by 2 independent authors. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies were considered in this systematic review. For inclusion, the self-management of patients had to have prerequisites, appropriate training, and be applicable in the aspects of anticoagulation therapy self-management, international normalized ratio (INR) self-testing, low-dose INR self-management, and heart valve function self-monitoring. In this method, through proper management of INR levels and anticoagulation therapy, the complications rate could be reduced and the patients would be able to diagnose functional disorders in the early stages by monitoring the valve function. This procedure was able to prevent the progression of complications. CONCLUSIONS: Self-management is an applicable protocol in the field of anticoagulation therapy, INR control, low-dose INR management, and the monitoring of cardiac valve function. This protocol could improve the quality of treatment for these patients through upgrading the care standards.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zandi et al. (2021) conducted a systematic review in Heart valve replacement. Self-management (anticoagulation therapy, INR self-testing, heart valve function self-monitoring) vs. Conventional management was evaluated on Clinical outcomes (complications rate, bleeding, thromboembolic events). Self-management of anticoagulation therapy and INR control in patients with heart valve replacement reduces complication rates and improves the quality of treatment compared to conventional management.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: