Key result
A structured teaching and self-management program for oral anticoagulation significantly reduced squared INR deviation compared to conventional care at 3 months (0.59 vs 0.95; P<.001).
Why the study?
Does a structured teaching and self-management program improve INR control and treatment-related quality of life in patients receiving long-term oral anticoagulation?
RCT (n=179)
Single-blind
Randomized
Yes
Does a structured teaching and self-management program improve INR control and treatment-related quality of life in patients receiving long-term oral anticoagulation?
Self-management of oral anticoagulation therapy through a structured education program improves INR control and patient quality of life compared to conventional care.
Supports structured self-management programs for oral anticoagulation in practice; extends RCT evidence on INR stability and satisfaction.
Control of oral anticoagulation therapy has been reported to often be inadequate. Previous retrospective investigations suggest that patients' self-adjustment of oral anticoagulants may lead to improved control.To investigate the effects of patients' self-management of oral anticoagulation therapy on accuracy of control and measures of treatment-related quality of life.Randomized, single-blind, multicenter trial.A total of 179 patients receiving long-term oral anticoagulation treatment were enrolled at 5 referral centers in Germany.Patients were randomized to an oral anticoagulation self-management group based on a structured treatment and teaching program and international normalized ratio (INR) self-monitoring. The control group received conventional care as provided by family physicians, including referral to specialists if necessary.Deviation of INR values from the individual INR target range (squared) and the 5 categories of treatment-related quality of life.Deviation of INR value from the mean of the INR target range was significantly lower in the intervention group at 3-month (squared INR deviation, 0.59 vs 0.95; P<.001) and 6-month follow-up (0.65 vs 0.83; P=.03) compared with the control group. Also, the intervention group had INR values within the target range more often (repeated measurement analysis for categorical data, P=.006). The results were mainly due to less frequent suboptimal INR values in the intervention group (32.8% vs 50.0% [P=.03] at 3-month, and 33.7% vs 48.2% [P=.08] at 6-month follow-up). Treatment-related quality-of-life measures, especially treatment satisfaction scores, were significantly higher in the intervention group compared with controls.An anticoagulation education program that includes self-management of anticoagulation therapy results in improved accuracy of anticoagulation control and in treatment-related quality-of-life measures. Further studies are needed to describe whether the program will reduce risk of bleeding or thromboembolism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peter T. Sawicki (1999) conducted an RCT in Long-term oral anticoagulation treatment (n=179). Structured teaching and self-management program with INR self-monitoring vs. Conventional care was evaluated on Deviation of INR values from the individual INR target range (squared) (p=<.001). A structured teaching and self-management program for oral anticoagulation significantly reduced squared INR deviation compared to conventional care at 3 months (0.59 vs 0.95; P<.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: