Key result
Oral anticoagulation education improves time in therapeutic range by ~3 percentage points.
Why the study?
Oral anticoagulation self-control programs have demonstrated efficiency and cost-effectiveness, but the effectiveness of a training intervention for patients on antivitamin K anticoagulants in a self-care program needed evaluation.
Does a specific educational training intervention improve disease knowledge and time in therapeutic range in patients on antivitamin K anticoagulants participating in a self-management program?
Does a specific educational training intervention improve disease knowledge and time in therapeutic range in patients on antivitamin K anticoagulants participating in a self-management program?
A structured educational training session significantly improved both disease knowledge and the time in therapeutic range for anticoagulated patients enrolled in a self-management program.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support educational training for VKA self-management; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
Oral anticoagulation self-control programs have demonstrated efficiency and cost-effectiveness over recent years. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a training intervention focused on patients with antivitamin K anticoagulants included in a self-care program. For this, we made a quasi-experimental study, pretest and post-test, using a validated questionnaire with 2 measures, before and after an educational intervention about oral anticoagulation focused on patients that will initiate the self-control program in consultation. To check the patient's adherence and coagulation level, we evaluated the Rosendaal time in therapeutic rank, both before and after the intervention. One hundred fifty patients were included since the start of the self-monitoring program in our center in 2016. The mean age was 49 years (standard deviation [SD] = 17.24). The distribution by gender was 76 women and 69 men (52.4%-47.6%). The mean score for the first test was 14.61 (SD = 3.26) and the mean score for the second test was 17.01 (SD = 2.14) (P <.001). We also measured Rosendaal time in therapeutic rank, a parameter that indicates stabilization in international normalized ratio determinations and quality of the anticoagulation management. Values before and after interventions were also statistically significant (67.46 vs 70.53, P <.001). Patients' knowledge improved after the training session, with statistical significance. Despite intentional sampling, the population was homogeneous. Scoring data dispersion in the second test was significantly lower than in the first one. Time on therapeutic rank values was better after the training. We intend to adapt its content to the rest of anticoagulated patients to enhance and improve their follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Romero-Arana et al. (2024) studied Oral anticoagulation therapy management (n=150). Educational training session on oral anticoagulation vs. Pre-intervention (baseline) was evaluated on Rosendaal time in therapeutic range (TTRr) (p=<0.001). An educational training intervention significantly improved patients' time in therapeutic range from 67.46 to 70.53, as well as their general knowledge regarding oral anticoagulation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: