Why the study?
Does left atrial appendage closure prevent stroke in atrial fibrillation patients?
Does left atrial appendage closure prevent stroke in atrial fibrillation patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review summarizes the current state of left atrial appendage closure for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation, highlighting both technological advancements and remaining clinical challenges.
Anticoagulation therapy plays a crucial role in the management of atrial fibrillation (AF), considering the high morbidity and mortality of AF-related ischemic strokes. With the plausible hypothesis that left atrial appendage is the main source of thrombus in AF patients, left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has been regarded as a potential substitute to oral anticoagulation in order to meet the unmet needs for stroke prevention, particularly in patients with high bleeding risk. Notable advancements in safety, efficacy, and device innovation have been made in recent years, albeit concerns still remain regarding the insufficient efficacy data, device-related complications, and the need for procedural optimization. We aim to review current knowledge about LAAC and provide potential future directions for the remaining key issues.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: