Key result
This article reviews the different techniques and devices for left atrial appendage occlusion as an alternative to oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
Do left atrial appendage closure devices provide an effective and safe alternative to oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Do left atrial appendage closure devices provide an effective and safe alternative to oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Left atrial appendage occlusion serves as an alternative therapeutic approach to oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May inform device selection for anticoagulation-intolerant AF patients; leaves open head-to-head trials versus contemporary NOACs.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases the risk for thromboembolic stroke five-fold. The left atrial appendage (LAA) has been shown to be the main source of thrombus formation in the majority of strokes associated with AF. Oral anticoagulation with warfarin and novel anticoagulants remains the standard of care; however, it has several limitations, including bleeding and poor compliance. Occlusion of the LAA has been shown to be an alternative therapeutic approach to drug therapy. The purpose of this article is to review the different techniques and devices that have emerged for the purpose of occluding this structure, with a particular emphasis on the efficacy and safety studies published to date in the medical literature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Romero et al. (2014) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation. Left atrial appendage closure devices vs. Oral anticoagulation was evaluated. This article reviews the different techniques and devices for left atrial appendage occlusion as an alternative to oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: