Why the study?
Do percutaneous strategies for LAA closure prevent AF-related stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Do percutaneous strategies for LAA closure prevent AF-related stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation?
This review highlights percutaneous left atrial appendage closure as a potential alternative to oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Bleeding risk persists despite improved stroke prevention with newer anticoagulants in AF; leaves open safer agents for future development.
Up to 6.1 million people in the United States have atrial fibrillation (AF), which is associated with an increased risk of stroke. Oral anticoagulants are the mainstay of stroke prevention in AF. For decades, warfarin was the only available drug, fraught with compliance limitations, a narrow therapeutic window, and a high risk of hemorrhage. Pharmacologic developments have produced new anticoagulants that have improved the rates of stroke related to AF; however, they still confer a high risk of bleeding, making them unsuitable for some patients. Studies have shown that roughly 90% of strokes in patients with AF occur in the left atrial appendage (LAA). This understanding has prompted the development and testing of novel percutaneous strategies for LAA closure as an alternative to anticoagulation therapy. The following review examines the relative merits and shortcomings of these strategies and explores future prospects in the prevention of AF-related stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dave et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: