Key result
Left atrial appendage closure provides stroke prevention comparable to oral anticoagulants while notably reducing bleeding events and associated mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
Selecting the most appropriate stroke prevention for AF requires individualization based on thromboembolic and bleeding risk and life expectancy, prompting an update on LAAC devices, techniques, and patient management.
Does left atrial appendage closure provide comparable stroke prevention and reduced bleeding compared to oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Does left atrial appendage closure provide comparable stroke prevention and reduced bleeding compared to oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review highlights that LAAC is a viable alternative to oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in AF patients, offering comparable efficacy with reduced bleeding risks.
INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an increased risk of stroke, morbidity and overall mortality. So far, oral anticoagulation (OAC) is the standard of care for stroke prevention, either with vitamin K antagonists or with non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs). The left atrial appendage (LAA) can be eliminated by epicardial or endocardial exclusion. Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) represents a mechanical thromboprophylaxis - which has also been termed mechanical vaccination - against stroke, bleeding and death. AREAS COVERED: Studies show that LAAC provides stroke prevention comparable to (N)OAC. Additionally, a notable reduction of bleeding events and its associated mortality is achieved by LAAC. With accruing experience and advances in patient selection, procedural planning, implantation techniques and devices, contemporary LAAC registries report high rates of success and low rates of complications. EXPERT OPINION: The decision to provide the most appropriate stroke prevention for patients with AF (OAC, NOAC or LAAC) needs to be individualized to patients' thromboembolic and bleeding risk and life expectancy. This review on LAAC provides an update on contemporary devices and techniques, as well as recommendations for patient selection and management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kleinecke et al. (2020) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation. Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) vs. Oral anticoagulation (OAC/NOAC) was evaluated. Left atrial appendage closure provides stroke prevention comparable to oral anticoagulants while notably reducing bleeding events and associated mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: