Key result
Home blood pressure monitoring reveals ~49% white-coat hypertension prevalence among stage 1 hypertensives.
Why the study?
Diagnosing arterial hypertension based on office blood pressure measurements has low accuracy.
Does home blood pressure monitoring via telemedicine identify masked and white-coat hypertension more accurately than office blood pressure in pre-hypertensive and stage 1 hypertensive patients?
Observational (n=1,273)
Does home blood pressure monitoring via telemedicine identify masked and white-coat hypertension more accurately than office blood pressure in pre-hypertensive and stage 1 hypertensive patients?
Home blood pressure monitoring reveals a high prevalence of diagnostic errors (33.3%) when relying solely on office blood pressure in pre-hypertensive and stage 1 hypertensive patients.
Office BP may misclassify early hypertension; leaves open whether telemedicine HBPM improves diagnostic accuracy or outcomes.
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of arterial hypertension based on measurements of blood pressure in the office has low accuracy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of masked hypertension (MH) and white-coat hypertension through home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) in pre-hypertensive and stage 1 hypertensive patients. METHOD: Retrospective study, of which sample consisted of individuals with BP ≥ 120/80 mmHg and < 160/100 mmHg at the medical office without the use of antihypertensive medication and who underwent exams on the HBPM platform by telemedicine (TeleMRPA) between May 2017 and September 2018. The four-day MRPA protocol was used, with 24 measurements, using automated, validated, calibrated equipment with a memory function. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 1,273 participants, of which 739 (58.1%) were women. The mean age was 52.4 ± 14.9 years, mean body mass index (BMI) 28.4 ± 5.1 kg/m2. The casual BP was higher than the HBPM in 7.6 mmHg for systolic blood pressure (SBP) and 5.2 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure (DBP), both with statistical significance (p < 0.001). There were 558 (43.8%) normotensive individuals; 291 (22.9%) with sustained hypertension; 145 (11.4%) with MH and 279 (21.9%) with white-coat hypertension (WCH), with a diagnostic error by casual BP in the total sample in 424 (33.3%) patients. In stage 1 hypertensive individuals, the prevalence of WCH was 48.9%; in prehypertensive patients, the prevalence of MH was 20.6%. CONCLUSION: MH and WCH have a high prevalence rate in the adult population; however, in prehypertensive or stage 1 hypertensive patients, the prevalence is higher. Out-of-office BP measurements in these subgroups should be performed whenever possible to prevent misdiagnosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barroso et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Pre-hypertensive and stage 1 hypertensive (n=1,273). Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) by telemedicine (TeleMRPA) vs. Casual (office) blood pressure was evaluated on Prevalence of masked hypertension and white-coat hypertension. Home blood pressure monitoring revealed a 48.9% prevalence of white-coat hypertension in stage 1 hypertensives and a 20.6% prevalence of masked hypertension in prehypertensives.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: