Why the study?
To provide an update on the imaging of myocardial fibrosis, including prognostication, risk stratification tools, electrophysiologic considerations, and disease monitoring.
How do cardiac imaging techniques, particularly MRI, assist in the evaluation, prognostication, and management of myocardial fibrosis?
How do cardiac imaging techniques, particularly MRI, assist in the evaluation, prognostication, and management of myocardial fibrosis?
This review highlights the critical role of advanced MRI techniques in the comprehensive assessment and management of myocardial fibrosis.
May guide fibrosis assessment in practice; leaves open outcome impact pending prospective trials.
Myocardial fibrosis (MF) is defined as excessive production and deposition of extra-cellular matrix proteins that result in pathologic myocardial remodeling. Three types of MF have been identified: replacement fibrosis from tissue necrosis, reactive fibrosis from myocardial stress, and infiltrative interstitial fibrosis from progressive deposition of nondegradable material such as amyloid. Although echocardiography, nuclear medicine, and CT play important roles in the assessment of MF, MRI is pivotal in the evaluation of MF, with the late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) technique used as a primary end point. The LGE technique focuses on the pattern and distribution of gadolinium accumulation in the myocardium and assists in the diagnosis and establishment of the cause of both ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy. LGE MRI also aids prognostication and risk stratification. In addition, LGE MRI is used to guide the management of patients considered for ablation for arrhythmias. Parametric mapping techniques, including T1 mapping and extracellular volume measurement, allow detection and quantification of diffuse fibrosis, which may not be detected by LGE MRI. These techniques also allow monitoring of disease progression and therapy response. This review provides an update on the imaging of MF, including prognostication and risk stratification tools, electrophysiologic considerations, and disease monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karur et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: