Why the study?
Atrial fibrillation is increasingly prevalent and worsens symptomatology in heart failure, motivating an analysis of the role of inflammation and fibrosis biomarkers when both conditions are present.
Do inflammation and fibrosis biomarkers differ between heart failure patients with and without atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=108)
No
Do inflammation and fibrosis biomarkers differ between heart failure patients with and without atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 3684.4% vs 2930.32%
p-value: p=0.482
In patients with heart failure, the presence of atrial fibrillation does not significantly alter the levels of established HF biomarkers such as sST2, Galectin-3, and NT-proBNP.
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasingly prevalent among the general population as well as in those exhibiting heart failure (HF), and the symptomatology progressively worsens when both conditions are met. The aim of this study was to analyse the role of inflammation and fibrosis biomarkers in patients with AF and HF. Methods: 108 subjects with heart failure were enrolled in the study. All patients were evaluated clinically, biologically and echocardiographically. Plasma values of NTproBNP, Gal-3 and sST2 were determined. Results: Out of all patients, 64.8% experienced at least one AF event. There were no differences in the mean left ventricular ejection fraction between the groups, which was 39.4 ± 11.2%. In terms of left atrium dimensions, the values in the AF group were significantly higher ( 51.19 ± 7.3 vs. 44.68 ± 7.16 mm, p<0.001). AF history was associated with a trend of decreased eGFR - 59,22±24,1 ml/min/1.73m3 vs 75,95±29,1 ml/min/1.73m3(p=0.006). There was no statistically significant difference in the level of HF biomarkers (sST2, Galectin-3 and NT-pro BNP) between individuals with or without AF. Conclusion: Patients with HF are at greater risk to develop AF. HF biomarkers (sST2, Galectin-3 and NT-pro BNP) are not influenced by the presence of AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frîngu et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Decompensated heart failure (n=108). Atrial fibrillation vs. Sinus rhythm was evaluated on NT-proBNP levels (pg/ml) (p=0.482).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: