Why the study?
The accuracy of 4D flow MRI for directly assessing peak velocity, flow volume, and momentum of mitral regurgitation flow jets needed evaluation across varying spatial resolutions and quantification locations.
Does 4D flow MRI accurately assess peak velocity, flow volume, and momentum of mitral regurgitation flow jets compared to Doppler ultrasound?
Does 4D flow MRI accurately assess peak velocity, flow volume, and momentum of mitral regurgitation flow jets compared to Doppler ultrasound?
4D flow MRI provides accurate assessment of mitral regurgitation flow jets, though spatial resolution significantly impacts flow quantification.
4D flow MRI may aid preclinical MR jet assessment at high resolution; leaves open human validation and optimal voxel sizing before clinical use.
Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of four‐dimensional (4D) flow MRI for direct assessment of peak velocity, flow volume, and momentum of a mitral regurgitation (MR) flow jets using an in vitro pulsatile jet flow phantom. We systematically investigated the impact of spatial resolution and quantification location along the jet on flow quantities with Doppler ultrasound as a reference for peak velocity. Methods Four‐dimensional flow MRI data of a pulsatile jet through a circular, elliptical, and 3D‐printed patient‐specific MR orifice model was acquired with varying spatial resolution (1.5–5 mm isotropic voxel). Flow rate and momentum of the jet were quantified at various axial distances (x = 0–50 mm) and integrated over time to calculate Vol jet and MTI jet . In vivo assessment of Vol jet and MTI jet was performed on 3 MR patients. Results Peak velocities were comparable to Doppler ultrasound (3% error, 1.5 mm voxel), but underestimated with decreasing spatial resolution (−40% error, 5 mm voxel). Vol jet was similar to regurgitant volume (RVol) within 5 mm, and then increased linearly with the axial distance (19%/cm) because of flow entrainment. MTI jet remained steady throughout the jet (2%/cm) as theoretically predicted. Four and 9 voxels across the jet were required to measure flow volume and momentum‐time‐integral within 10% error, respectively. Conclusion Four‐dimensional flow MRI detected accurate peak velocity, flow rate, and momentum for in vitro MR‐mimicking flow jets. Spatial resolution significantly impacted flow quantitation, which otherwise followed predictions of flow entrainment and momentum conservation. This study provides important preliminary information for accurate in vivo MR assessment using 4D flow MRI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2021) studied Mitral regurgitation (n=3). Four-dimensional (4D) flow MRI vs. Doppler ultrasound was evaluated on Peak velocity, flow volume, and momentum of mitral regurgitation flow jets.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More on Mitral valve interventionMore from Magnetic Resonance in Medicine