Key result
COVID-19 epidemic linked to ~44% higher MACE risk in antihypertensive users regardless of treatment interruptions.
Why the study?
The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted healthcare access, raising questions about whether it modified the effect of antihypertensive interruptions on the risk of major cardiovascular events.
Does antihypertensive drug interruption increase the risk of major cardiovascular events, and is this effect modified by the COVID-19 epidemic period in patients with prior continuous use?
Cohort (n=4,145,344)
Yes
Does antihypertensive drug interruption increase the risk of major cardiovascular events, and is this effect modified by the COVID-19 epidemic period in patients with prior continuous use?
Effect estimate: OR 0.99 (95% CI 0.97-1.02)
The COVID-19 epidemic independently increased the risk of MACE in antihypertensive users, but did not worsen the slight risk increase associated with treatment interruptions of ≥15 days.
Antihypertensive interruptions showed no overall MACE link; leaves open modification by future epidemics in broader cohorts.
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted healthcare access, potentially impacting cardiovascular prevention by increasing and worsening interruptions in antihypertensive treatment. In this context, we aimed to assess whether the epidemic had modified the effect of antihypertensive interruptions on the risk of major cardiovascular events (MACE). METHODS: From the nationwide SNDS French health insurance databases (2018/01/01-2021/12/31), we identified patients with ≥1 year of continuous antihypertensive drug use. We then constituted a group of patients who interrupted an antihypertensive during the period (interrupters) i.e., who presented with a treatment gap for at least one antihypertensive (entry date: interruption date). Interruption length defined was defined as time to treatment restart. After 1:1 matching, we constituted a second group of patients with continuous antihypertensive treatment at interrupters entry date (persisters; entry date: interrupter entry date). Associations between MACE risk, antihypertensive drug interruption (all durations, ≥15 days, ≥30 days), COVID epidemic period, and the interaction between these were assessed using GEE multivariable models. RESULTS: A total of 2,072,672 interrupter/persister pairs were included (4,145,344 patients; 43.6% in COVID period). Risk of MACE was not found increased after interruptions overall (OR = 0.99; 95%CI [0.97-1.02]); it was when interruptions lasted at least fifteen days (OR = 1.03 [1.01-1.06]) and during the COVID period independently of the existence of interruptions (OR = 1.44 [1.39-1.50]; P-value for interaction: all interruptions 0.69, exceeding 15 days 0.65). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID epidemic period was associated with an increased risk of MACE or all-cause death in antihypertensive drug users without worsening the effect of antihypertensive drug interruptions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mathieu et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Antihypertensive drug users (n=4,145,344). Antihypertensive drug interruption vs. Continuous antihypertensive treatment was evaluated on Major cardiovascular events (MACE) (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.97-1.02). The COVID-19 epidemic increased MACE risk in antihypertensive users (OR 1.44; 95% CI 1.39-1.50) but did not significantly modify the effect of treatment interruptions (P=0.69 for interaction).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: