Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
June 1, 1984Journal of Histochemistry & CytochemistryOpen Access

Quantitative enzyme assays showed essentially complete agreement with ATPase staining in distinguishing types I and II human muscle fibers, though agreement was less consistent for types IIA and IIB.

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Population

Human and rat muscle fibers

Comparison

Histochemical ATPase stains vs Quantitative enzyme assays of fragments of the…

Design

Preclinical

Key result

Quantitative enzyme assays showed essentially complete agreement with ATPase staining in distinguishing types I and II human muscle fibers, though agreement was less consistent for types IIA and IIB.

Authors

CHC. S. HintzECEdward F. CoyleKKKenneth K. Kaiser

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Supports enzyme assays for type I/II fiber distinction in research; leaves open validation for IIA/IIB subtypes.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Human and rat muscle fibers
I
Intervention
Histochemical ATPase stains
C
Comparator
Quantitative enzyme assays of fragments of the same fibers (lactate dehydrogenase and either adenylokinase or malate dehydrogenase)
O
Outcome
Agreement in distinguishing muscle fiber typessurrogate

Histochemical ATPase staining and quantitative metabolic enzyme assays show complete agreement in distinguishing type I and II muscle fibers, but less consistency for subtypes.

Cite This Study

Hintz et al. (1984) studied Muscle fiber typing. Quantitative enzyme assays vs. Myosin ATPase staining was evaluated on Agreement between ATPase staining and metabolic enzyme assays in distinguishing fiber types. Quantitative enzyme assays showed essentially complete agreement with ATPase staining in distinguishing types I and II human muscle fibers, though agreement was less consistent for types IIA and IIB.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a09001e0465d979db9d0f0ahttps://doi.org/10.1177/32.6.6202737
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share