Why the study?
Do left ventricular ejection fraction measurements obtained by invasive contrast left ventriculography, two-dimensional echocardiography, and gated SPECT correlate strongly in patients hospitalized with chest pain?
Do left ventricular ejection fraction measurements obtained by invasive contrast left ventriculography, two-dimensional echocardiography, and gated SPECT correlate strongly in patients hospitalized with chest pain?
Invasive contrast left ventriculography, two-dimensional echocardiography, and gated SPECT provide strongly correlated measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with chest pain.
Supports LVEF assessment by any modality in chest pain; extends observational comparisons but leaves open prospective validation.
Objectives: Left ventricular ejection fraction can be measured by a variety of invasive and non-invasive cardiac techniques. This study assesses the relation of three diagnostic modalities to each other in the measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction: invasive contrast left ventriculography, two-dimensional echocardiography, and quantitative gated single-photon emission computed tomography. Methods: Retrospective chart review was conducted on 58 patients hospitalized with chest pain, who underwent left ventricular ejection fraction evaluation using each of the aforementioned modalities within a 3-month period not interrupted by myocardial infarction or revascularization. Results: The mean left ventricular ejection fraction values were as follows: invasive contrast left ventriculography (0.44±0.15), two-dimensional echocardiography (0.46±0.13), and gated single-photon emission computed tomography (0.37±0.10). Correlations coefficients and associated p values were as follows: invasive contrast left ventriculography versus two-dimensional echocardiography (r=0.69, p<0.001), invasive contrast left ventriculography versus gated single-photon emission computed tomography (r=0.80, p<0.0001), and gated single-photon emission computed tomography versus two-dimensional echocardiography (r=0.69, p<0.001). Conclusion: Our results indicate that strong positive correlations exist among the three techniques studied.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Garg et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: