Why the study?
Despite established benefits of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in heart failure, historical barriers to enrolment and uptake remain.
Does exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation improve outcomes in patients with heart failure?
Does exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation improve outcomes in patients with heart failure?
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation provides significant mortality, morbidity, and quality of life benefits in heart failure, highlighting the need to overcome barriers to its utilization.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports EBCR in HF; leaves open optimal implementation to overcome access barriers.
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (EBCR) is a treatment modality for patients with heart failure (HF) that has withstood the test of time. It has continued to show benefits even in the current era of pharmacotherapeutics for HF. Participation in a multidisciplinary comprehensive EBCR programme reduces mortality and morbidity, has a multitude of physiological benefits, and improves cardiovascular risk factor control and quality of life. Despite this, historical barriers to enrolment and uptake remain. Strategies to overcome these, as well as alternative delivery methods of EBCR in HF patients, are emerging and include telerehabilitation, focus on special groups and emphasis on behavioural change. This review provides oversight on the modalities of exercise training in HF as well as their benefits and gives an overview of barriers to the utilisation of EBCR along with future progress in the field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ong et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: