Key result
Home-based HFrEF cardiac rehab aligns with ESC and BACPR components but lacks long-term lifestyle management.
Why the study?
The review aimed to clarify how closely existing studies of home-based cardiac rehabilitation for HFrEF align with core components defined by the ESC and BACPR.
Do home-based cardiac rehabilitation programs for HFrEF patients align with ESC and BACPR core components?
Systematic Review (n=1,241)
Do home-based cardiac rehabilitation programs for HFrEF patients align with ESC and BACPR core components?
The majority of home-based cardiac rehabilitation programs for HFrEF patients show medium to high alignment with ESC and BACPR standards, though long-term strategies and lifestyle risk factor management need improvement.
May guide home-based CR refinements for HFrEF; confirms medium-high alignment but leaves long-term and lifestyle gaps for targeted research.
BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is the most common cardiovascular reason for hospital admission, particularly among patients older than 60 years old. Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) comprises approximately 50% of all heart failure cases. Home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) is an alternative option to enhance the participation rate in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) interventions for patients who are not able to attend center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR). The purpose of this review is to clarify the extent to which present studies of HBCR align with the core components defined by both the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the British Association for Cardiac Prevention and Rehabilitation (BACPR). METHODS: A critical review was conducted through four databases, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, to identify randomized controlled trials up until June 2022. We scrutinized the commonalities between BACPR and ESC and developed a list of standards. The risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2 tool. RESULTS: Among the 87 papers selected for full-text screening, 11 studies met the inclusion criteria. Six papers possessed a high proportion of fidelity to essential standards, four studies had a medium alliance, and one intervention had a low level of alliance. CONCLUSION: Overall, the majority of included studies had medium to high alignment with standards and core components. However, a need for more attention to long-term strategy as an important standard is revealed. Rapid identification and initial assessment are the most met standards; however, lifestyle risk factor management and long-term outcomes were recognized as the least met standards.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Darvishzadehdaledari et al. (2023) conducted a systematic review in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=1,241). Home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) vs. Center-based cardiac rehabilitation or usual care was evaluated on Alignment with ESC and BACPR core components. Home-based cardiac rehabilitation programs for HFrEF showed medium to high alignment with ESC and BACPR core components in most studies, though long-term strategy and lifestyle risk management were often lacking.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: