Key result
CYP2C19 genotype-guided P2Y12 inhibitor therapy yields similar MACE rates across all metabolizer phenotypes.
Why the study?
The study evaluated genotype-guided P2Y12 inhibitor selection to maximize efficacy and attenuate risk in patients undergoing PCI for CAD.
Does CYP2C19 genotype-directed P2Y12 inhibitor therapy normalize risk for MACE in patients who underwent PCI for CAD?
Cohort (n=868)
No
Does CYP2C19 genotype-directed P2Y12 inhibitor therapy normalize risk for MACE in patients who underwent PCI for CAD?
p-value: p=0.083
CYP2C19 genotype-directed P2Y12 inhibitor therapy normalizes the risk of MACE post-PCI across different metabolizer phenotypes.
May normalize post-PCI MACE risk across CYP2C19 phenotypes with guided therapy; leaves open confirmation in randomized studies.
OBJECTIVE: inhibitor selection to maximize efficacy, and attenuate risk in appropriate patients who underwent PCI for CAD. METHODS: inhibitor based on the results. Patients were divided into two groups based on clopidogrel metabolizer status. Group I: Intermediate (IM) and poor metabolizers (PM). Group II: Ultra-rapid (UM), rapid (RM) and normal metabolizers (NM). Each group was then categorized to one of two treatment arms guided by CYP2C19 genotype. Category 1: IM/PM started on clopidogrel, switched to ticagrelor or prasugrel; 2:IM/PM started on ticagrelor/prasugrel, continued these medications; 3: UM/RM/NM started on ticagrelor/prasugrel, switched to clopidogrel; 4: UM/RM/NM started on clopidogrel, continued clopidogrel. Death due to cardiac causes, bleeding events, non-fatal MI, target vessel revascularization (TVR), and MACE in all four categories were considered at 1, 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: We did not observe significant difference between phenotypes for MACE at 1 (p = 0.274), 6 (p = 0.387), and 12 months (p = 0.083). Death due to cardiac causes, MI, and bleeding events were not significant at 1, 6, and 12 months. There was no significant difference in TVR at 6 (p = 0.491), and 12 months (p = 0.423) except at 1 month (p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: inhibitor to optimize patient quality and safety when appropriate in post PCI patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Styŝ et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease (n=868). CYP2C19 genotype-guided P2Y12 inhibitor therapy vs. Comparison across 4 genotype-treatment categories was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 12 months (p=0.083). CYP2C19 genotype-guided P2Y12 inhibitor therapy resulted in similar rates of major adverse cardiovascular events across all metabolizer phenotypes at 12 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: