Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The paper develops a geographical approach to the issues of policy transfer and transformation, taking the form of a critical dialogue with three literatures at the borderlands of political science, comparative institutionalism, and political sociology. Making the case for moving beyond rational-choice frameworks and essentialized, formalist representations of policy transfer, the paper advocates a social-constructivist understanding of policy mobilities-and-mutations, sensitive to the constitutive roles of spatiotemporal context.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jamie Peck (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: