Key result
Automated cardiac adipose tissue segmentation in Dixon MRI cuts tracing time ~82% vs manual tracing.
Why the study?
Does an automated segmentation algorithm accurately and efficiently quantify cardiac adipose tissue in Dixon MRI compared to manual tracing?
Does an automated segmentation algorithm accurately and efficiently quantify cardiac adipose tissue in Dixon MRI compared to manual tracing?
Absolute Event Rate: 2.81% vs 15.84%
p-value: p=<0.00001
An automated segmentation algorithm for cardiac adipose tissue in Dixon MRI is significantly faster than manual tracing, demonstrating feasibility for cardiac risk stratification despite some underestimation of volume.
May accelerate adipose quantification workflows; leaves open prospective validation of accuracy before clinical adoption.
Objective: Increasing evidence suggests a strong link between excess cardiac adipose tissue (CAT) and the risk of a cardiovascular event. Multi-echo Dixon magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), providing fat-only and water-only images, is a useful tool for quantification but requires the segmentation of CAT from a large number of images. The intent of this study was to evaluate an automated technique for CAT segmentation from Dixon MRI by comparing the contours identified by the automated algorithm to those manually traced by an observer. Methods: An automated segmentation algorithm, based on optimal thresholds and custom morphological processing, was applied to the registered fat-only and water-only images to identify CAT in the volume scans. CAT contours in 446 images, from 10 MRI scans, were selected for validation analysis. Cross-sectional area (CSA) and volume were computed and compared using Bland-Altman analysis. In addition, Hausdorff distance and Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) were used for assessment.Results: Linear regression analysis yielded correlation of R2 = 0.381 for CSA and R2 = 0.879 for volume. When compared to the observer, the computer algorithm under-estimated CSA by 27.5 ± 40.0% and volume by 26.4 ± 10.4%. The average bidirectional Hausdorff distance was 26.2 ± 16.0 mm while the average unidirectional Hausdorff distances were 24.5 ± 15.7 mm and 12.4 ± 11.7 mm. The average DSC was 0.561 ± 0.100. The time required for manual tracing was 15.84 ± 3.73 min and the time required for the computer algorithm was 2.81 ± 0.12 min.Conclusions: This study provided a technique, faster and less tedious than manual tracing (p < 0.00001), for quantification of CAT in Dixon MRI data, demonstrating feasibility of this approach for cardiac risk stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Klingensmith et al. (2017) studied Cardiac adipose tissue quantification (n=10). Automated segmentation algorithm vs. Manual tracing by an observer was evaluated on Time required for tracing (p=<0.00001). An automated segmentation algorithm for cardiac adipose tissue in Dixon MRI was significantly faster than manual tracing (2.81 vs 15.84 min, p<0.00001), demonstrating feasibility for quantification.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: