Key result
3D cine Dixon MRI quantified epicardial fat with lower intra- and inter-observer variability compared to standard single-phase Dixon, while yielding systematically lower fat volumes (145 vs 165 ml, p<0.01).
Why the study?
Epicardial fat is linked to cardiovascular diseases, and while single-phase Dixon techniques have been used for quantification, the merits of a new high-resolution cine 3D Dixon technique remained to be investigated.
Does 3D cine Dixon MRI improve the reproducibility of epicardial fat quantification compared to single-phase 3D Dixon MRI in patients with cardiovascular disease?
Observational (n=15)
Blinded for visual scoring
No
Does 3D cine Dixon MRI improve the reproducibility of epicardial fat quantification compared to single-phase 3D Dixon MRI in patients with cardiovascular disease?
3D cine Dixon MRI provides more reproducible epicardial fat quantification than standard single-phase Dixon by leveraging time-resolved cardiac motion to better delineate fat boundaries.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May enhance reproducibility of epicardial fat quantification in research; leaves open clinical utility or risk stratification.
Background There is an increased interest in quantifying and characterizing epicardial fat which has been linked to various cardiovascular diseases such as coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation. Recently, three-dimensional single-phase Dixon techniques has been used to depict the heart and to quantify the surrounding fat. The purpose of this study was to investigate the merits of a new high-resolution cine 3D Dixon technique for quantification of epicardial adipose tissue and compare it to single-phase 3D Dixon in patients with cardiovascular disease. Methods Fifteen patients referred for clinical CMR examination of known or suspected heart disease were scanned on a 1.5T scanner using single-phase Dixon and cine Dixon. Epicardial fat was segmented by three readers and intra- and inter-observer variability was calculated per slice. Cine Dixon segmentation was performed in the same cardiac phase as single-phase Dixon. Subjective image quality assessment of water and fat images were performed by three readers using a 4-point Likert scale (1 = severe; 2 = significant; 3 = mild; 4 = no blurring of cardiac structures). Results Intra-observer variability was excellent for cine Dixon images (ICC = 0.96), and higher than single-phase Dixon (ICC = 0.92). Inter-observer variability was good for cine Dixon (ICC = 0.76) and moderate for single-phase Dixon (ICC = 0.63). The intra-observer measurement error (mean ± standard deviation) per slice for cine was − 0.02 ± 0.51 ml (-0.08 ± 0.4%), and for single-phase 0.39 ± 0.72 ml (0.18 ± 0.41%). Inter-observer measurement error for cine was 0.46 ± 0.98 ml (0.11 ± 0.46%) and for single-phase 0.42 ± 1.53 ml (0.17 ± 0.47%). Visual scoring of the water image yielded median of 2 (interquartile range = [Q3-Q1] 2–2) for cine and median of 3 (interquartile range = 3 − 2) for single-phase ( P < 0.05) while no significant difference was found for the fat images, both techniques yielding a median of 3 and interquartile range of 3 − 2. Conclusion Cine Dixon can be used to quantify epicardial fat with lower intra- and inter-observer variability compared to standard single-phase Dixon. The time-resolved information provided by the cine acquisition appears to support the delineation of the epicardial adipose tissue depot.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Henningsson et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Known or suspected heart disease (n=15). 3D cine Dixon MRI vs. Single-phase 3D Dixon MRI was evaluated on Epicardial fat volume (ml) (p=<0.01). 3D cine Dixon MRI quantified epicardial fat with lower intra- and inter-observer variability compared to standard single-phase Dixon, while yielding systematically lower fat volumes (145 vs 165 ml, p<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: