Key result
Axial single-slice measurements of epicardial and pericardial fat correlated strongly with total fat volumes, with the best correlation at the left coronary artery (r = 0.94, P < 0.001).
Why the study?
Epicardial and pericardial fat are prognostic markers for cardiac diseases, but volumetric measurement of these fat compartments is time-consuming.
Can total volume of epicardial and pericardial fat be accurately estimated by single-slice MRI measurements compared to 3D volumetry in individuals undergoing cardiac MRI?
Observational (n=113)
Can total volume of epicardial and pericardial fat be accurately estimated by single-slice MRI measurements compared to 3D volumetry in individuals undergoing cardiac MRI?
Effect estimate: r = 0.94
p-value: p=<0.001
Single-slice MRI measurements at specific anatomical landmarks provide a highly correlated, time-efficient estimation of total epicardial and pericardial fat volumes compared to whole heart volumetry.
Single-slice MRI may simplify epicardial/pericardial fat quantification in practice; leaves open outcome validation in cardiac cohorts.
Background Epicardial (ECF) and pericardial fat (PCF) are important prognostic markers for various cardiac diseases. However, volumetry of the fat compartments is time-consuming. Purpose To investigate whether total volume of ECF and PCF can be estimated by axial single-slice measurements and in a four-chamber view. Material and Methods A total of 113 individuals (79 patients and 34 healthy) were included in this retrospective magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study. The total volume of ECF and PCF was determined using a 3D-Dixon sequence. Additionally, the area of ECF and PCF was obtained in single axial layers at five anatomical landmarks (left coronary artery, right coronary artery, right pulmonary artery, mitral valve, coronary sinus) of the Dixon sequence and in a four-chamber view of a standard cine sequence. Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated between the total volume and each single-slice measurement. Results Axial single-slice measurements of ECF and PCF correlated strongly with the total fat volumes at all landmarks (ECF: r = 0.85–0.94, P < 0.001; PCF: r = 0.89–0.94, P < 0.001). The best correlation was found at the level of the left coronary artery for ECF and PCF ( r = 0.94, P < 0.001). Correlation between single-slice measurement in the four-chamber view and the total ECF and PCF volume was lower ( r = 0.75 and r = 0.8, respectively, P < 0.001). Conclusion Single-slice measurements allow an estimation of ECF and PCF volume. This time-efficient analysis allows studies of larger patient cohorts and the opportunistic determination of ECF/PCF from routine examinations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vach et al. (2021) reported an observational. Axial single-slice measurements vs. Total volume measurements was evaluated on Correlation between single-slice measurements and total fat volumes (r = 0.94, p=<0.001). Axial single-slice measurements of epicardial and pericardial fat correlated strongly with total fat volumes, with the best correlation at the left coronary artery (r = 0.94, P < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: