Key result
≥3 non-viable LV segments predict ~22-fold higher odds of recurrent ischemic MR >II° post-surgery.
Why the study?
Does cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging predict recurrent ischaemic mitral regurgitation in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and LV dysfunction undergoing combined CABG and restrictive mitral valve annuloplasty?
Cohort (n=40)
Does cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging predict recurrent ischaemic mitral regurgitation in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and LV dysfunction undergoing combined CABG and restrictive mitral valve annuloplasty?
Preoperative CMR identification of non-viable LV segments, particularly in the posterior and inferior walls, strongly predicts the recurrence of ischaemic mitral regurgitation after combined CABG and restrictive mitral annuloplasty.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CMR viability assessment should not yet guide surgical decisions in ischaemic MR; leaves open prospective validation of patient selection.
We aimed to evaluate (i) the effectiveness of combined surgery (coronary artery bypass grafting with restrictive mitral valve annuloplasty) and (ii) the late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance-based predictors of ischaemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) recurrence.The prospective analysis included 40 patients with multivessel coronary artery disease, IMR >II° and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction undergoing combined surgery. The degree of IMR and LV parameters were assessed preoperatively by transthoracic echocardiography, 3D transoesophageal echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance and postoperatively by transthoracic echocardiography. The effective mitral valve repair group (n = 30) was defined as having recurrent ischaemic mitral regurgitation (RIMR) ≤II° at the end of follow-up (25 ± 11 months).The surgery was effective: freedom from RIMR >II° at 1 and 2 years after surgery was 80% and 75%, respectively. Using multivariable logistic regression, 2 independent predictors of RIMR >II° were identified: ≥3 non-viable LV segments (odds ratio 22, P = 0.027) and ≥1 non-viable segment in the LV posterior wall (odds ratio 11, P = 0.026). Using classification trees, the best combinations of cardiovascular magnetic resonance-based and 3D transoesophageal echocardiography-based predictors for RIMR >II° were (i) posterior mitral valve leaflet angle >40° and LV end-systolic volume index >45 ml/m2 (sensitivity 100%, specificity 89%) and (ii) scar transmurality >68% in the inferior LV wall and EuroSCORE II >8 (sensitivity 83%, specificity 78%).There is a clear relationship between the amount of non-viable LV segments, especially in the LV posterior and inferior walls, and the recurrence of IMR after the combined surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Glaveckaitė et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Ischaemic mitral regurgitation (n=40). Combined surgery (coronary artery bypass grafting with restrictive mitral valve annuloplasty) was evaluated on Recurrent ischaemic mitral regurgitation (RIMR) >II° (OR 22, p=0.027). The presence of ≥3 non-viable left ventricular segments strongly predicted the recurrence of ischaemic mitral regurgitation >II° after combined surgery.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: