Why the study?
Is the Myosplint device safe and feasible for the treatment of heart failure?
Observational (n=21)
Is the Myosplint device safe and feasible for the treatment of heart failure?
The initial human experience with the Myosplint device demonstrates safety and feasibility, with improvements in NYHA class and LV ejection fraction in patients receiving the device alone.
Supports early safety in small HF cohort; hypothesis-generating pending randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: The Myocor Myosplint device is a passive implantable device for the treatment of heart failure by changing the geometry of the left ventricle (LV). AIM: The purpose of this evaluation was to describe the first human experience with the Myosplint device to demonstrate safety and feasibility. METHODS: Of the first consecutive 21 patients, 9 patients received a Myosplint device alone while 12 patients underwent a mitral valve repair as well. Safety and efficacy data were gathered at enrollment and during follow-up. RESULTS: No serious device-related adverse events or device failures were observed. Three patients died during the follow-up period, and 2 patients underwent heart transplantation. There was a significant improvement in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class from 3.0 +/- 0.3 at baseline to 2.1 +/- 0.7 at 6 months (p = 0.001). Both LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes had decreased at follow-up. The LV ejection fraction significantly increased in the Myosplint alone group (from 17.1 +/- 4.0% at baseline to 21.8 +/- 4.1% at 3 months and 23.1 +/- 7.2% at 6 months) but not in the Myosplint and mitral valve repair group. The mitral regurgitation (MR) grade had a significant (p = 0.002) linear relationship with the NYHA functional class. CONCLUSIONS: The initial clinical experience of the Myosplint device demonstrated both safety and feasibility, validating the LV shape change concept in humans. A remodeling solution must, however, include MR resolution, to illustrate the need for a device that can simultaneously reduce or eliminate functional MR off-pump.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fukamachi et al. (2005) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=21). Myosplint device vs. Myosplint device with mitral valve repair was evaluated on Safety, feasibility, and NYHA functional class (p=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: