Key result
Cardiovascular imaging guides HFpEF diagnosis, identifies distinct biological phenotypes, and refines risk stratification.
Why the study?
HFpEF represents a heterogeneous syndrome rather than a single entity, necessitating a move beyond one-size-fits-all management toward precise disease classification to develop targeted therapies and personalize risk stratification.
Advanced cardiovascular imaging enables precise phenotyping of HFpEF, moving beyond a singular syndrome approach to targeted disease classification and risk stratification.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating for imaging-based HFpEF phenotyping; prospective trials needed before clinical adoption.
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) does not exist as a singular clinical or pathological entity but as a syndrome encompassing a wide range of clinical and biological phenotypes. There is an urgent need to progress from the unsuccessful 'one-size-fits-all' approach to more precise disease classification, in order to develop targeted therapies, personalise risk stratification and guide future research. In this regard, this review discusses the current and emerging roles of cardiovascular imaging for the diagnosis of HFpEF, for distilling HFpEF into distinct disease entities according to underlying pathobiology and for risk stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lewis et al. (2020) conducted a review in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Cardiovascular imaging was evaluated. Cardiovascular imaging is essential for diagnosing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, identifying distinct biological phenotypes such as myocardial fibrosis, and guiding risk stratification.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: