Key result
Short-term DAPT followed by ticagrelor monotherapy matches standard DAPT for MACE and reduces major bleeding.
Why the study?
It was unclear whether short-term DAPT followed by ticagrelor monotherapy is associated with favorable outcomes compared with standard DAPT after PCI.
Does short-term DAPT followed by ticagrelor monotherapy reduce adverse cardiovascular events and bleeding in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention compared to standard DAPT?
Meta-Analysis (n=26,143)
Does short-term DAPT followed by ticagrelor monotherapy reduce adverse cardiovascular events and bleeding in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention compared to standard DAPT?
Effect estimate: RR 0.86 (95% CI 0.72-1.02)
p-value: p=0.08
In patients undergoing PCI, short-term DAPT followed by ticagrelor monotherapy maintains ischemic efficacy while significantly reducing major bleeding and all-cause mortality compared to standard 6-12 month DAPT.
Supports abbreviated DAPT post-PCI to cut bleeding without raising MACE; confirms ticagrelor monotherapy safety in pooled data.
Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and subsequent P2Y 12 inhibitor monotherapy, particularly ticagrelor, is an emerging treatment strategy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This meta‐analysis was designed to investigate whether short‐term DAPT followed by ticagrelor monotherapy is associated with a favorable outcome as compared with standard DAPT (1–3 months of DAPT was termed “short‐term” DAPT, 6–12 months DAPT was termed “standard” DAPT). The primary outcome was the composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) comprising myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death. Secondary outcomes included all‐cause mortality and net adverse clinical events (NACE; myocardial infarction, stroke, all‐cause death, stent thrombosis, and major bleeding). The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. Three studies comprising 26,143 patients were included. The risk of MACE was similar between the two treatment groups (risk ratio (RR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.72–1.02, P = 0.08, I 2 = 22%). Short‐term DAPT followed by ticagrelor monotherapy resulted in a 20% relative risk reduction of all‐cause mortality (RR 0.80, 95% CI, 0.65–0.98, P = 0.03, I 2 = 0%) and an 18% relative risk reduction of NACE (RR 0.82, 95% CI, 0.71–0.94, P = 0.005, I 2 = 33%) as compared with standard DAPT. Short‐term DAPT followed by ticagrelor monotherapy significantly decreased the risk of major bleeding (RR 0.67, 95% CI, 0.49–0.92, P = 0.01, I 2 = 65%). In patients with acute coronary syndrome, short‐term DAPT followed by ticagrelor monotherapy resulted in an unchanged ischemic risk but a significantly lower bleeding risk compared with standard DAPT. Short‐term DAPT followed by ticagrelor monotherapy compared with standard DAPT resulted in a favorable safety and efficacy profile. Direct comparisons of aspirin vs. ticagrelor monotherapy following PCI are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gelbenegger et al. (2021) conducted a meta-analysis in Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n=26,143). Short-term DAPT followed by ticagrelor monotherapy vs. Standard DAPT (6-12 months) was evaluated on Composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) comprising myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.72-1.02, p=0.08). Short-term DAPT followed by ticagrelor monotherapy resulted in a similar risk of MACE compared with standard DAPT (RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.72-1.02; P=0.08) and significantly decreased major bleeding.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: