Key result
Coronary guide catheter ACT samples measure ~70 seconds higher than access sheath samples post-PCI.
Why the study?
Institutional observations suggested considerable differences between ACT values drawn from varying arterial sites during PCI with unfractionated heparin.
Does the site of sample draw (coronary guide catheter vs access sheath) affect the activated clotting time (ACT) value in patients undergoing PCI with unfractionated heparin?
Observational
No
Does the site of sample draw (coronary guide catheter vs access sheath) affect the activated clotting time (ACT) value in patients undergoing PCI with unfractionated heparin?
Effect estimate: Mean difference 70 seconds
Absolute Event Rate: 327% vs 257%
p-value: p=<.001
ACT values are substantially greater when assessed via the guide catheter versus the access sheath during PCI, which should be considered when managing anticoagulation.
The activated clotting time (ACT) assay is used to monitor and titrate anticoagulation therapy with unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Observations at our institution suggested a considerable difference between ACT values drawn from varying arterial sites, prompting the current study. Patients undergoing PCI with unfractionated heparin therapy were prospectively enrolled. Simultaneous arterial blood samples were drawn from the access sheath and the coronary guide catheter. Differences between Hemochron ACT values were determined, and potential interactions with clinical variables were analyzed. Immediately postprocedure, the simultaneous mean guide and sheath ACTs were 327 ± 62 seconds and 257 ± 44 seconds, respectively, with a mean difference of 70 ± 60 seconds (P < .001). Nearly all (90%) ACT values obtained via the guide catheter were higher than the concurrent ACT drawn from the sheath. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that lower weight-adjusted heparin doses and absence of diabetes were associated with a greater difference between the ACT values. We conclude that the ACT value is substantially greater when assessed via the guide catheter versus the access sheath. Although the biological mechanisms require further study, this difference should be considered when managing anticoagulation during PCI and when reporting ACT as part of research protocols.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morris et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Percutaneous coronary intervention. ACT sample from coronary guide catheter vs. ACT sample from access sheath was evaluated on Hemochron ACT value (Mean difference 70 seconds, p=<.001). Activated clotting time values drawn from the coronary guide catheter were significantly higher than those drawn from the access sheath (327 vs 257 seconds, P<.001) immediately post-PCI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: