Why the study?
Does the modified microsample ACT+ test provide comparable correlation and improved reproducibility compared to the conventional ACT test for heparin monitoring in cardiac surgery and angioplasty patients?
Does the modified microsample ACT+ test provide comparable correlation and improved reproducibility compared to the conventional ACT test for heparin monitoring in cardiac surgery and angioplasty patients?
The modified microsample ACT+ test provides a rapid, reproducible alternative to conventional ACT for heparin monitoring with a smaller blood sample requirement.
Supports ACT+ as reproducible microsample option for heparin monitoring; leaves open randomized outcome validation before practice change.
The activated clotting time (ACT) is a standard method of heparin monitoring during cardiac angioplasty and cardiac surgery. A modified ACT (ACT+) which employs a microsample blood volume (0.05 ml) and yields faster clotting time results than a conventional Hemochron ACT was evaluated and compared to the standard ACT. The ACT+, determined using a single channel general purpose analyzer (Hemochron Jr.), employs a plastic cuvette containing dried ACT reagents (kaolin-silica-phospholipid). In vitro evaluation of heparinized normal donor blood demonstrated the test insensitivity to aprotinin. Using split blood specimens, duplicate ACT and ACT+ were performed (n=92) and a correlation between the two was established. In evaluation of 79 cardiac surgery and 53 angioplasty patients, good correlation was observed between ACT+ and Hemochron ACT (r=0.93, n=574). Mean versus difference plots demonstrated an improved reproducibility of the ACT+ (Mean SD=35 seconds) compared to the ACT (Mean SD=53 seconds), presumably due to automation of the blood sample sizing and blood/reagent mixing. These studies indicate that the microsample ACT+ is an alternative to the conventional ACT with an advantage of small sample requirement and rapid reproducible results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pan et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: