Why the study?
Although spontaneous coronary artery dissection often resolves with conservative management, percutaneous coronary intervention is sometimes necessary despite technical challenges.
This review summarizes the indications, challenges, and technical recommendations for percutaneous coronary intervention in spontaneous coronary artery dissection.
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a distinct and increasingly recognized cause of acute coronary syndromes, primarily affecting young and middle-aged women with few cardiovascular risk factors. While SCAD often resolves spontaneously with conservative management, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is sometimes necessary, especially in patients with ongoing ischemia or high-risk anatomical features. This review summarizes the current state of knowledge regarding the interventional approach in SCAD, emphasizing the rationale for conservative treatment, and the indications for and challenges associated with PCI. It also provides practical recommendations, particularly highlighting technical aspects of PCI in SCAD, the critical role of intracoronary imaging, and the modality and timing of post-PCI surveillance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lombardi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: