Key result
Magnetocardiography parameters of QTc dispersion ≥79 ms or SI-QTc ≥9 ms detected significant coronary artery disease with a diagnostic accuracy of 81% (AUC 0.7855).
Why the study?
Does resting magnetocardiography (MCG) accurately detect coronary artery disease and cardiac allograft vasculopathy in patients with suspected CAD and OHT recipients?
Cross-Sectional (n=101)
Yes
Does resting magnetocardiography (MCG) accurately detect coronary artery disease and cardiac allograft vasculopathy in patients with suspected CAD and OHT recipients?
Resting magnetocardiography is a clinically feasible non-invasive tool for diagnosing CAD and may serve as a surrogate marker for cardiac allograft vasculopathy.
May support non-invasive CAD evaluation; hypothesis-generating for allograft vasculopathy and needs prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Electrophysiological information as well as anatomic information are important for the detection of coronary artery lesions. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of resting magnetocardiography (MCG) in stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). METHODS AND RESULTS: MCG and coronary angiography were performed within 1 month in 75 patients with suspected CAD and in 26 subjects after orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). Plaque volumes were additionally measured on intravascular ultrasound in OHT recipients. The spatially distributed QT(c) interval maps were constructed with 64-channel MCG. A T-wave propagation map and QT(c) heterogeneity index including QT(c) dispersion and smoothness index of QT(c) (SI-QT(c)) were derived for ischemia detection and localization. CAD patients had higher QT(c) dispersion and SI-QT(c). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified SI-QT(c) ≥9 ms, QT(c) dispersion ≥79 ms as the optimal cut-off for detecting CAD (diagnostic accuracy, 0.7953, 0.7819), better than T-wave propagation (0.6594, P<0.05). There was no significant difference of QT(c) dispersion between CAD and OHT subjects. In OHT recipients, QT(c) dispersion positively correlated with plaque volume, and SI-QT(c) progressively increased after transplantation. Using T-wave propagation mapping, regionally increased dispersion could be demonstrated in CAD patients, but increased dispersion was noted in fewer OHT recipients. CONCLUSIONS: MCG is clinically feasible as a non-invasive tool for diagnosis of CAD, and could be used as a surrogate marker of CAV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2013) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary Artery Disease and Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy (n=101). Magnetocardiography (MCG) vs. Coronary angiography and Intravascular ultrasound was evaluated on Detection of significant CAD using QTc dispersion ≥79 ms or SI-QTc ≥9 ms (AUC 0.7855, 95% CI 0.6811-0.8900). Magnetocardiography parameters of QTc dispersion ≥79 ms or SI-QTc ≥9 ms detected significant coronary artery disease with a diagnostic accuracy of 81% (AUC 0.7855).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: