Why the study?
Can temporary pacing catheter leads withstand the high energy shocks used in nonsurgical electrical ablation?
Can temporary pacing catheter leads withstand the high energy shocks used in nonsurgical electrical ablation?
In vitro testing demonstrates that temporary pacing leads vary significantly in their ability to withstand high-energy shocks, highlighting the need for prior testing before use in human ablation procedures.
In vitro lead differences advise caution for ablation use; leaves open prospective human validation.
Nonsurgical electrical ablation of tachycardia pathways or foci has been attempted or carried out using a variety of temporary pacing catheter leads. To determine the ability of such leads to withstand the high energies used in such procedures, 34 leads were suspended in saline, and subjected to repeated electrical shocks. Small (4 French) temporary pacing leads made by a variety of manufacturers tolerated multiple shocks up to 100 joules; above this level, failures became increasingly common, although usually the failure mode was benign with respect to patient care implications. Testing of 6, 7, and 8 French leads revealed considerable inter-and intra-manufacturer differences in the ability to withstand higher energy shocks, reflecting differences in materials and fabrication techniques. It is concluded that careful in vitro lead testing is required prior to using identical models in humans for arrhythmia ablation procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fisher et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: