Key result
Direct application of radiofrequency and cryo-ablation energy to 42 CIED leads in vitro resulted in no insulation damage and preserved lead functionality in all leads.
Why the study?
Does direct application of radiofrequency or cryo-ablation energy damage cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) leads in an in vitro model?
Does direct application of radiofrequency or cryo-ablation energy damage cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) leads in an in vitro model?
In vitro testing suggests that direct contact between ablation catheters and CIED leads does not compromise lead integrity or function, challenging current recommendations to avoid such contact.
In vitro data indicate no CIED lead damage from direct ablation; leaves open whether contact is safe in vivo.
INTORDUCTION: Medical societies and cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) manufacturers recommend avoiding close or direct contact between the body of transvenous leads and ablation catheters used to treat cardiac arrhythmias. These recommendations are made despite the lack of clinical studies. However, the target myocardium for successful ablation can be contiguous to CIED leads. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examine in vitro the effects of direct application of radiofrequency (RF) and cryo-ablation energy on the integrity and functionality of CIED leads (excluding the pacing electrodes and defibrillation coils). A saline bath was created to mimic the body milieu. CIED leads, including all commercially available lead insulation materials, were connected to a CIED pulse generator and placed in direct contact with an ablation catheter in the tissue bath. RF and cryo-ablation energy were delivered under various conditions, including maximal ablation power, temperature, and impedance via the RF generator. CIED lead functionality, reflective of conductor integrity, was evaluated through lead impedance monitoring during ablation. CIED leads were then visually inspected, and examined with optic and electron microscopy as per protocol. A total of 42 leads were studied. All leads showed the absence of insulation damage at the site of ablation visually and with microscopy. Lead functionality was also preserved in all leads. CONCLUSION: Catheter ablation in contact with CIED leads using radiofrequency or cryo-ablation in vitro did not affect lead body integrity and function despite aggressive ablation settings. It may be reasonable to perform ablation in contact with the body of CIED leads when clinically necessary.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Darrat et al. (2016) studied this question. Radiofrequency and cryo-ablation was evaluated on Lead insulation damage and functionality. Direct application of radiofrequency and cryo-ablation energy to 42 CIED leads in vitro resulted in no insulation damage and preserved lead functionality in all leads.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: