Key result
Dual-energy lattice-tip ablation eliminates VT in 3 patients but increases opposing CIED lead capture thresholds.
Why the study?
Achieving adequate lesion depth during VT ablation within scar is challenging with conventional RF energy.
Does dual-energy lattice-tip ablation for VT in patients with CIEDs affect lead capture thresholds?
Case Report (n=3)
No
Does dual-energy lattice-tip ablation for VT in patients with CIEDs affect lead capture thresholds?
Dual-energy lattice-tip ablation effectively treats VT in transmural scar but can inadvertently increase CIED lead capture thresholds on the opposing myocardial surface.
Warrants CIED parameter checks after dual-energy VT ablation; hypothesis-generating in this small case series.
Background Achieving adequate lesion depth during ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation within scar is challenging with conventional radiofrequency energy (RF). The lattice-tip catheter enables dual-energy ablation (RF & pulsed field [PF]) with enhanced tissue penetration. Objective We report on 3 cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) patients with transmural apical left ventricular (LV) scars and drug-refractory VT. Each underwent endocardial LV ablation using RF & stacked PF. Ablation included delivery near the opposing surface of CIED leads, at sites critical for the VT circuit. CIED parameters were assessed pre- and post-procedure, as well as at interval follow-up. Results VT was eliminated with complete non-inducibility achieved in all cases, and there has been no recurrence at early follow-up (4-6months). However, each case demonstrated inadvertent CIED lead capture threshold rise (apical right ventricular x2, anterolateral LV coronary sinus branch x1), with partial recovery over time. Findings correlated with ablation near opposing lead electrodes. Conclusion Dual-energy lattice-tip ablation creates effective ventricular lesions through transmural scar that may increase CIED capture thresholds on the opposing myocardial surface. Our report recommends vigilance during ablation opposing CIED leads, balancing the respective wall thickness and potential for lead damage against the gravity of the arrhythmic presentation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luther et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Drug-refractory ventricular tachycardia with transmural apical left ventricular scars and CIEDs (n=3). Dual-energy lattice-tip endocardial LV ablation (radiofrequency and pulsed field) was evaluated on Complete non-inducibility of ventricular tachycardia. Dual-energy lattice-tip ablation successfully eliminated ventricular tachycardia in 3 patients with transmural scars but inadvertently increased CIED lead capture thresholds on the opposing surface.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: