Key result
Sphere-9 catheter ablation is linked to slight declines in RV lead impedance and sensing at 3 months.
Its licence doesn't allow us to show a copy here.
Why the study?
Data on the impact of the Sphere-9 lattice-tip catheter delivering radiofrequency and pulsed field ablation on cardiac implantable electronic device function are limited.
Does ventricular arrhythmia ablation using the Sphere-9 dual-energy lattice-tip catheter affect cardiac implantable electronic device performance in patients with pre-existing CIEDs?
Observational (n=65)
Does ventricular arrhythmia ablation using the Sphere-9 dual-energy lattice-tip catheter affect cardiac implantable electronic device performance in patients with pre-existing CIEDs?
Ventricular arrhythmia ablation using the Sphere-9 dual-energy lattice-tip catheter is associated with minor but persistent changes in CIED lead parameters and a rare risk of generator failure when delivering pulsed field ablation near lead electrodes.
Small CIED parameter shifts after Sphere-9 VT ablation warrant post-procedure interrogation; leaves open clinical relevance and safe PFA-lead distance.
BACKGROUND The Sphere-9 lattice-tip catheter (Affera, Medtronic) enables delivery of both radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and pulsed field ablation (PFA) for ventricular arrhythmia (VA) ablation. Data on its impact on cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are limited. OBJECTIVES This study sought to evaluate changes in CIED function following VA ablation using the Sphere-9 catheter. METHODS We reviewed 65 consecutive patients (median age 71 years, 94% male, 63% ischemic cardiomyopathy, median left ventricular ejection fraction 31%) with pre-existing CIEDs who underwent VA ablation (62 ventricular tachycardia [95%], 3 premature ventricular contraction [5%]) using the Sphere-9 catheter (combined RFA/PFA (53 [82%]), RFA alone (6 [9%]), PFA alone (6 [9%])). Device interrogation was performed within 30 days preprocedure, within 7 days postprocedure, and at 3-month (+/- 30 days) follow-up. RESULTS At 3-months, right ventricular leads demonstrated reduced sensing amplitude (11.7-10.0 mV, P = 0.04), pacing impedance (441-422 Ω, P < 0.001), shock impedance (64-59 Ω, P = 0.01), and increased capture threshold (0.9-1.0 V at 0.4-0.5 milliseconds, P = 0.03). Left ventricular (LV) leads demonstrated reduced pacing impedance (544-475 Ω, P = 0.04), whereas LV capture threshold remained elevated (1.0-1.4 V, P = 0.08). Right atrial lead parameters remained stable. No patient required CIED revision. One patient experienced cardiac resynchronization therapy-D pulse generator failure during PFA delivery 7.5 mm from an LV lead tip electrode, requiring generator replacement. CONCLUSIONS Ventricular arrhythmia ablation using the Sphere-9 dual-energy lattice-tip catheter was associated with small but persistent changes in right and left ventricular lead parameters. Serious CIED interactions were uncommon, and further studies are needed to better understand the underlying mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahmoodi et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Ventricular arrhythmias in patients with pre-existing cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) (n=65). Sphere-9 dual-energy lattice-tip catheter ablation was evaluated on Changes in CIED function (right and left ventricular lead parameters). Sphere-9 catheter ablation was associated with reduced right ventricular pacing impedance (441 to 422 Ω, P<0.001) and sensing amplitude (11.7 to 10.0 mV, P=0.04) at 3 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: