Why the study?
Does candesartan 16 mg / HCTZ 12.5 mg improve blood pressure and metabolic risk factors in patients with uncontrolled hypertension and additional risk factors?
Observational (n=3,787)
Yes
Does candesartan 16 mg / HCTZ 12.5 mg improve blood pressure and metabolic risk factors in patients with uncontrolled hypertension and additional risk factors?
In a primary care setting, treatment with candesartan/HCTZ effectively reduced blood pressure and was associated with favorable changes in metabolic risk factors.
May support candesartan/HCTZ in primary care uncontrolled hypertension; leaves open confirmation of metabolic benefits in randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: The reduction of blood pressure alone does not eliminate the increased risk of arterial hypertension. Whilst concomitant metabolic risk factors have been shown to be responsible, the available pharmacotherapy has differential effects on these metabolic risk factors. For example, diuretics and betablockers worsen glucose metabolism, hence the starting point of the current subanalysis of the CHILI (Candesartan in patients with HIgher cardiovascuLar rIsk) study was the assumption that an angiotensin receptor blocker may counterbalance the metabolic effects of a low dose diuretic in patients with several metabolic risk factors. METHODS: The present study was performed as a non-interventional observational study in Germany. Patients with previously uncontrolled hypertension with at least one further risk factor in which physicians deemed a treatment with 16 mg Candesartan/12.5 mg HCTZ to be necessary were included. The risk factors were calculated in patient subgroups with diabetes, the metabolic syndrome (MetSyn) and neither condition (control). The risk of cardiovascular mortality within the next 10 years was calculated using the SCORE algorithm of the ESC. RESULTS: Between August 2006 and February 2007 a total of 3,787 patients were included into the non-interventional trial. Patients were 62.2 +/- 11.3 years old, 48.1% were female, 97.5% had at least one additional risk factor. Blood pressure was reduced by -27.2/-13.4 mmHg with only minor non significant variations between patient groups. Waist circumference was reduced (P < 0.0001) and HDL-C elevated (P < 0.05) in every subgroup except the control subgroup. Fasting blood glucose was reduced by -5.6 +/- 21.6% (P < 0.0001 vs. baseline and vs. control) as well as triglycerides (-4.9 +/- 29.4%; P < 0.0001 vs. baseline and vs. control). The SCORE value was reduced substantially (-8.7, -3.2 and -2.7% in patients with diabetes, the metabolic syndrome or neither). CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates that a 16 mg candesartan/12.5 mg HCTZ based treatment results in a pronounced blood pressure reduction and was associated with a favourable change in metabolic risk factors such as HDL cholesterol, triglycerides and blood glucose. These data indicate that metabolic effects observed in clinical trials like ALPINE, SCOPE or CHARM can also be observed in an unselected patient population in primary care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bramlage et al. (2008) conducted an observational in Uncontrolled hypertension with at least one additional cardiovascular risk factor (n=3,787). Candesartan / Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) was evaluated on Change in systolic blood pressure (p=<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: