Key result
Surgical mitral repair cuts PVC burden ~55%, while TEER in AMVP is linked to higher NSVT.
Why the study?
Arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse is associated with malignant ventricular arrhythmias, but the impact of surgical repair versus TEER on arrhythmic outcomes remains unclear.
Does surgical mitral repair or TEER reduce arrhythmic burden in patients with arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse?
Cohort (n=1,911)
No
Does surgical mitral repair or TEER reduce arrhythmic burden in patients with arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse?
Absolute Event Rate: 33% vs 7%
p-value: p=<0.01
Surgical mitral repair is associated with a reduction in arrhythmic burden in patients with arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse, whereas TEER is associated with persistently elevated ventricular arrhythmias.
TEER may increase ventricular arrhythmia risk in AMVP; leaves open whether surgical repair is safer pending prospective trials.
OBJECTIVES: Arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse (AMVP) is associated with malignant ventricular arrhythmias, yet the impact of surgical repair versus transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) on arrhythmic outcomes remains unclear. We evaluated ventricular arrhythmia occurrence and premature ventricular contraction (PVC) burden following mitral repair in patients with and without AMVP. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1911 patients who underwent surgical mitral valve repair or TEER between 2004 and 2024 at a single institution. AMVP was defined per EHRA/ESC criteria, requiring mitral valve prolapse with frequent (≥5% PVC burden) or complex ventricular arrhythmias and no alternative arrhythmic substrate. Outcomes included non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT), ventricular tachycardia (VT), implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation, mortality, and changes in PVC burden in patients with pre- and post-procedural rhythm monitoring. RESULTS: Among 154 patients with AMVP, 109 (71%) underwent surgical repair and 45 (29%) underwent TEER. Following surgical repair, patients with AMVP had similar rates of NSVT (18% vs 13%), VT (3.7% vs 3.6%), and ICD implantation (3.7% vs 3.7%) compared with non-AMVP patients. In contrast, after TEER, patients with AMVP experienced significantly higher NSVT (33% vs 7%, P < 0.01), VT (12% vs 2.6%, P = 0.01), and ICD implantation (4.7% vs 0%, P = 0.02). PVC burden decreased after surgical repair (1.1% to 0.5%, P < 0.001) but remained unchanged after TEER. Mortality was higher in AMVP but not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical mitral repair is associated with reduced arrhythmic burden in AMVP, whereas TEER is associated with persistently elevated ventricular arrhythmias. These findings support phenotype-guided repair strategies and underscore the need for prospective studies comparing arrhythmic outcomes across repair modalities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sharew et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Mitral valve prolapse with and without arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse (AMVP) (n=1,911). Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) vs. Non-AMVP patients was evaluated on Non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) after TEER in AMVP vs non-AMVP patients (p=<0.01). Surgical mitral repair reduced PVC burden (1.1% to 0.5%, P<0.001), whereas TEER in AMVP patients was associated with higher NSVT (33% vs 7%, P<0.01) compared to non-AMVP patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: