Key result
Concomitant use of an extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and a left ventricular assist device was feasible, with inappropriate shocks occurring only during a septic shock episode.
Why the study?
Combining extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillators with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is challenging due to potential electromagnetic interference, and concomitant use had not been previously reported.
Case Report (n=1)
No
This report documents the first experience of combining a durable LVAD with an extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, highlighting the challenge of potential electromagnetic interference.
Provides first report of extravascular ICD with durable LVAD; leaves open interference risks and generalizability.
Extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator is a recently developed substernal system to prevent sudden cardiac death. Extravascular devices, such as subcutaneous and substernal implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, were designed to avoid the possible complications of conventional transvenous leads. However, their combination with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is often challenging. Electromagnetic interference generated by the LVAD may affect previously implanted cardioverter-defibrillators, particularly subcutaneous extravascular devices. To our knowledge, this is the first reported experience of the concomitant use of an extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator with a durable LVAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Papp et al. (2025) conducted a case report in End-stage heart failure (n=1). Extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (EV-ICD) and Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) was evaluated on Device function and electromagnetic interference (EMI). Concomitant use of an extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and a left ventricular assist device was feasible, with inappropriate shocks occurring only during a septic shock episode.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: